Read the rest of this thread for the right answer.
Maybe he did and like me he does think that this is 'the right answer', if there ought to be one. Like I said before, to me time is merely a concept, not a real thing. Its a mathematical instrument, invented to help solve problems.
How? His statement was so wrong that it sums up less then nothing. Read the rest of this thread for the right answer.
I disagree.
Then how does gravity, and black holes warp it, and how is it relative?
It doesnt warp anything, it warps our ability to perceive it in the same way than we usually would.
Or in a literal way, it warps the very essence of whatever it is, breaking down the way that it works normally.
Sorry, but time is a construct. You can argue to high heaven, but like heaven, it doesnt actually exist.
Take any measurement of distance. Its only that distance because of what we are and our ability to perceive at this level of reality.
And just for the record, if you can tell me for a fact that gravity and black holes warp time, you will be rich. In fact, prove either exists. You would also be rich. Not saying they dont, but we dont actually know that they do.
Then its deffo not a point of argument to show the existence of time
yes it is, thats the question in the thread title!
there is no way to prove it exists.
somebody asks you how old you are, if you answer them with your correct age then you support the existence of time. in saying that it doesnt exist, you come of as a hypocrite.
yes it is, thats the question in the thread title!
How bout this then... Saying that a black hole warps time is not an argument for the existence of time because you will have a hard time proving the black hole even exists... see? That is what I mean.
somebody asks you how old you are, if you answer them with your correct age then you support the existence of time. in saying that it doesnt exist, you come of as a hypocrite.
