Forums → WEPR → Hell don't under estimate it.
| 73 | 10052 |
- 73 Replies
the evolution or any other scientifical theory is made of so many coinicidences (XD) so the chances of all those things to happento lead to where and what we are today is almost imposibble.
Do you know what this is?
Ill give you a hint. It is a puddle, and proof of faeries. What are the chances that this puddle is just randomly like it is? Look, the water fits into it perfectly. So therefore, since something like this couldn't possibly be random, it must mean that faeries exist and form every puddle.
so if you look at it this way religios actually has a better chance to be the truth.
So by that math, we are all turtles, since that is more likely than this world is true, do to the fact that for it to be true, we all only need to be turtles, and for it to be wrong than everything else must exist. Therefor, we are all turtles by your logic.
anyway that is just MY theory. im not stating what i believe in. im stating what can happen. in the end the chances dont matter because as long as there is the smallest chance that theory/religion can be true. my point is that we will never know anything beyond our lives or time periods (not counting when we die and if we go to hell/heaven of course)
But the thing is there is no chance that your hypothesis/religion could be true, no more than the turtle theory I just made up off the top of my head. It has no chance in a metaphorical hell of existing at all.
the evolution or any other scientifical theory is made of so many coinicidences (XD) so the chances of all those things to happento lead to where and what we are today is almost imposibble. while the only thing that has a low chance in religions is gods existance. if only that happens then all the other things have 100% chance to happen.
so if you look at it this way religios actually has a better chance to be the truth.
You speak of the evolution as if it has been set up in one piece and then everybody looked for evidence for it. Seriously? Of course the odds that our world, like it is now, are extremely low for it to happen. What you failed to see is that it obviously did happen, and we are solely documenting how it did happen, by finding out how things work. We are working backwards on the events that happened, we didn't imagine some weird theory and try to find proofs.
This basically makes your argument void.