Rejecting good does not derive into evil - if I refuse to share my food with someone, am I being evil? No, I am refusing to be good.
Well, you ARE being evil here, in case you have food to share. If you have less than mandatory for survival, your refusal is not evil, as you have not enough for yourself, although if you do, this will be a good deed.
However, when standards begin to rise, and you have more than essentials, and the person next to you has the less than essentials to living, the refusal to do good could be considered evil. Agreed?
Agreed.
But a fair argument is that actions made by Christians and teachings made by God contradict moral purity.
Actions of Christians can, we are still humans and can fall into temptations and stuff. But what about teachings of God? Leviticus again? If so, the main position of Leviticus is to outcast a sinner from "your neighbors" set of people, then you're free to stone him to death. When Jesus came, He said to love everyone, so this method of outcasting is no longer valid, and all of the death punishments cannot be applied anymore.
What if Jesus defeats Satan after the rapture? Wouldn't everyone in Hell be freed?
Jesus has alrady defeated Satan in Heaven, and will rip his power on Earth from him at the end of time. I am unsure about "freeing those who are in Hell", the medieval belief stated a negative here, because those in Hell have no more ability to choose and their outcome originates from ultimately rejecting God's love. Therefore their sins won't release them. I don't know about whether God will grant them another chance to repent, I wish so, but it's for God to decide.
Or he could make us perfect.
In that case we'll be angels, but God already created angels.
No human is initially evil.
I would like you to prove that.
Who said one can't prove a negative? Was that you? (umm no, that was MGW)
No evidence or proof as far as I know, that and he does not let us know directly he is there.
There's Bible providing evidence for a 1980yo proof that God was walking here as a human. You don't believe this is proof? Okay.
It boils down that God indirectly made evil for no real reason.
I can't provide you a reason why God did that and not that, indeed, and I don't think it will be revealed to anyone here. We can only perceive and come up with say "God wished us to raise from the mundane into perfection and willingly accept Him as their God, which requires trial and error", as I have once heard and probably mistaken in understanding and recalling, but still the true reason is hidden from us. God said "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways" (Isaiah 55:8) so we have to be satisfied with this and believe that all God does is for our ultimate good, as He said elsewhere.
You say humans cannot know good without knowing evil - that's logic, but God surpasses it.
Yep, but we require logic to discern good from evil, along with the basics of what's good and what's evil. God granted us the Decalogue to have a rock solid base, and humans constantly question "Is this really evil?" Ain't it illogical?
What are the chances that this puddle is just randomly like it is?
1.0, because you first fix the randomness and then ask. Now if you give me another picture of the same pool which will totally resemble this one but will be taken in a different time and will not be edited anyhow, then this will be considered evidence.
This is what deism is, the only way there could be any sort of divine being. He created all that the universe needed to self run, let it happen, and left/did not interfere. (I think)
Deism is indeed this, "God made the universe and went away leaving all to be". But this is not the only way of God to exist. Are you familiar with the chaos theory? God's actions in changing the world are as unknown as what butterfly caused this and this, and when, but they have an impact over the history.
