Partydevil, what you're doing is not right. The way you type is a little hard to understand on first glance to begin with, and the part that GoblinD quoted was a severe wtf.
At first, you refer to Afghanistan's fertility level, of 6. [Google says 6.5, Factbook says 5.39, so 6 is fine, whatever]]
Then, you say 3 by US, 1 by Terrorists, and that Women are bombed. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Now, what I'm guessing is that you mean that of those 6 babies born, 3 have contact with US activities and 1 with other terrorists groups and women, too, witness such, which leads to support your point that most of these kids will think negatively of the USA. Just a guess, but if you're here to converse with GoblinD, you should at least have the decency to give him an explanation rather than just be obnoxious.
I guess you're a Muslim living in the western world right? Muslims living in places like Pakistan, Afghanistan or Syria have a slightly different culture.
That's slightly off, aside from the street smarts, the school system, the English accent, I'm not much different than my cousins. Brown people take their culture with them.
and about 5% of you're community would start blowing things up and try to take over the country for Islam
That is a stupid assumption. You're basing on some odd belief that of whatever number of Muslim immigrants enter a country, a certain percent of them must be extremists ready to take over the country for their religion.
That hasn't even happened yet on a historical scale yet you just assume that to be the case? The truth is, most of Western Europe is dropping in population, and, to fulfill yearly losses in labor, they get more immigrants. Upon seeing that they are losing their homogenous society, they are a little spooked. Not being offensive, but that's just the case. It's not like France's population of Muslims is growing due to some underlying belief of invading the country.
Oh stop being so naive. If you're country was conquered by the West and Imams would tell you regularly about how the West is destroying the world you wouldn't be so nice to them either
Afghanistan is not conquered. The last time it was conquered by the west was by ancient Greece, during a time where the eastern half of the country wasn't even connected. If it were USA v. Afghanistan, I'm sure we'd have a new Vietnam in our face. I don't think people there need Imams to tell them that the bombs that have been dropping from the sky for the last ten years are from the USA.
What I am trying to say is that sometimes when people countries make actions like picking allies, the question of what matters more religion or nationality can make the difference.
Well, this doesn't make any sense. Nearly all countries in the world chose their buddies this way. North Africa is better allied with the Muslim Word, East Africa, than it is with the Southern Area. South Africa much better allies it with Europe. If you look further in, you'll see the religions match nicely. All of the US's early allies were Christians usually in Europe, along with Catholic Latin America [but, due to the US's more protestant nature, military force was also used and supported in Latin America]. This happens everywhere, it is no wonder that Muslim Nations ally with Muslim Nations. In some areas of the world, Nationality is defined by one's culture, and some of that culture might stem from a religion.
Sorry but i doubt Muslims in Afghanistan think as rational as you do in Egypt about the West.
I'm sure they think just as rationally, most of them just witness much more destruction and happen to have a lot less money. That changes the way you think about things.
IMO I think its good that the area with most of the oil in the world is changing away from dictatorships. Perhaps they will be more open to trade then in about 50 years.
Most open oil is in trade. A lot of it is nationalized, in places like Mexico, Argentina, and Saudia Arabia. By doing so, the use of the oil, its destination, and it's price is determined a lot by politics.
