ForumsWEPRwar on pakistan

261 58665
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

as now things r going like Indian war excercises on our eastern borders and some american officials saying that they will attack in pakistan if they have to (like in jacobabad)
do you think there will be a war on pakistan by India and america or both
and
what will b china & israel's position on it

  • 261 Replies
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

those times have passed europe got enough of its economical troubles to get into a war


If you're talking about Greece, Spain, or Portugal, I aggree with you. Italy is getting better, Germany and France are fine, and the UK has those pesky rioters, but those are a small minority.

Its akin to you looking at the Wall Street Protestors, and then saying America is going to fall to Communism in 6 months. :/

bridge layers, lets see if they can lay a bridge one mile long


Even if you had a river that was one mile wide at its thinnest point, then we'd just build a pontoon bride. Or air lift our tanks to the other side. Or just use our amphibious tanks to get accross.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Length of river jhelum bridge is 1516m

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

u will air lift your tanks but tell me wont u have to secure on the other side of the river.Sure u can use paratroopers but they will be sky diving from alltitude less than that of ur bombers and they will b sitting ducks for our aa's and flaks
may b u will b able to secure ground eventually but at a very high price

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

u will air lift your tanks but tell me wont u have to secure on the other side of the river.

A quick bombing raid will take care of that. I doubt that the entire length of the river will be impossibly well defended.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Bombing is not the solution for every thing
u bomb we hide in spider holes when bombing is over we get back up again

loco5
offline
loco5
16,287 posts
Peasant

Bombing is not the solution for every thing


it kinda is

u bomb we hide in spider holes when bombing is over we get back up again


you mean foxholes? anywho were not using those touch detonation bombs from WW2 we have incendiary and proximity, those 'safe' foxholes are gonna be rained on by shrapnel
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

lets say u bomb the place into rubble with rubble blocking the roads blown up bridges and well dug infantry men in that rubble with anti tanks weapons and snipers and and MGs
thanks to your bombing ur tanks will b nothing more than cannons.In the end it will come down to man vs man and thats where we will have upper hand cuz we will have more soldiers on the ground than u

loco5
offline
loco5
16,287 posts
Peasant

ets say u bomb the place into rubble with rubble blocking the roads


tanks are off roaders bro

well dug infantry men in that rubble with anti tanks weapons and snipers and and MGs


ohai so do we

thanks to your bombing ur tanks will b nothing more than cannons


that is essentially what they are, cannons on wheels

thats where we will have upper hand cuz we will have more soldiers on the ground than u


where the hell are you getting these stats? we have a much larger army than yours, as said before if you recruited all your men and someone how trained and equipped them, and we did the same, we'd still have more.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

@ loco
keeping stats aside when things will start to heat up there r many organisations in pakistan who readily train any one for combat and is we will b invaded so at the time being we will have more manpower than USA
cuz USA will not start drafting till it starts to lose its men and as things r going i dont think commoners will support that war in USA and ppl in USA will have a little bit choice in joining the army some will try to evad the draft too on the other hand it wil b matter of life and death for pakistan.
and yes tanks r cannons on wheels and they r off roaders but unless u have a flying tank or some thin like that u can not just roll it over
on rubble of a 6 story building especially in the middle of a fight
they will b sitting ducks for RPGs while doing so

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

u will air lift your tanks but tell me wont u have to secure on the other side of the river


Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (PART ONE)
Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (PART TWO)

ITs able to cary 17 fully equiped marines, plus seven crew.

Four M551 Sheridans, plus Paratroopers

Four Humvees, plus 50 Paratroopers

they will b sitting ducks for our aa's and flaks


You mean those Flak Guns we destroyed?

America: We'll free the sh!t out of you!

may b u will b able to secure ground eventually but at a very high price


Yeah. Ordinance has gotten pretty expensive lately.

when bombing is over we get back up again


No. When the bombing is over, you will be dead.
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

they will b sitting ducks for RPGs while doing so


Observe what happens when a M1A2 Abrahms runs over an IED in Iraq:

Tank Commander: Hey driver, did you hear something?
Tank Driver: No, I didn't hear anything.
Tank Commander: Thats funny, I thought I heard an IED go off.
Tank Driver: I didn't hear anything bro.
Tank Commander: Oh. Keep driving then.

And if that didn't do anything, your RPGs wont do squat. Besides, almost every vehicle in the US Arsenal, with the exception of a few light Humvees, has some sort of defense against RPGS: Anywhere from Cages that prevent the plasma bolt from forming to high-tech solutions that actually blow up the warhead while its in flight.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

yeah ten will give their life and 20 more will b there to take their place

Turtelman1234
offline
Turtelman1234
2,911 posts
Nomad

Length of river jhelum bridge is 1516m


Ummmmm? I don't think so.

they will b sitting ducks for our aa's and flaks


Remember? We've already bombed everything by the time we start dropping down troops. Not to mention you'd have the Army Rangers shooting you in the backs of your heads. You got a small taste of what the US's military is capable of when Seal Team 6 went in there and got Osama, (which you've said nothing about, yet) went in there unseen, shot some bullets, and got out of there in about 45 minutes. Imagine what our entire military can do if a single squad did all that, everyone that wore a turban in that building had a gaping hole in their head if it didn't already pop like a watermelon.

well dug infantry men in that rubble with anti tanks weapons and snipers and and MGs


If the blast doesn't kill you and the rubble doesn't crush you, have fun hiding in the ruins of your cities.

u bomb we hide in spider holes when bombing is over we get back up again


And then we shoot you with our predator drones. Have fun shooting down a heartless, ruthless, robotic plane with AK's.

In the end it will come down to man vs man and thats where we will have upper hand cuz we will have more soldiers on the ground than u


Won't matter how many troops you have, we have the better trained soldiers and the better weapons.
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

yeah ten will give their life and 20 more will b there to take their place


As I said before, even if both sides enforced consription, we'd still outnumber you almost 2:1.

If you include the National Guard, the US can deploy 3.5 Million men. If we constripted every avaliable male from ages 18-49, and kept those that were physically able, we'd have a force of about 70 Million.

On the other hand, Pakistan has a standing force, plus reserves of 1.1 Million. If they drafted every avaliable male from ages 18-49, and kept those that were physically able, you'd have a force of about 40 Million.

I dunno about your math, but 70 Million > 40 Million. Take into account we have better training, weapons, technology, etc, etc, you'd be lucky if we didn't blow your entire nation up.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

@ 1234
u r not the only ones with drones we too have drones [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3VcUVimSh8]

@ maverick I already explained this point

Showing 106-120 of 261