Well a lot of people have been telling me evolution is real. They give me the most craziest surreal 'facts'. Has anyone discovered any fish with legs? Any humans with gills or fins? If you put all the pieces of a watch into you're pocket and shake it around for trillions of years, will it ever become a watch? Is there but one possibility? Or if you completely dismantle a chicken and a fish, and put it into a box, shaking it around for trillions of years. Will it ever become a fish with wings? or a chicken with fins? :l
Aye, once sea creatures, i.e dolphins, started swamping themselves on land
Dolphins and other cetaceans went in reverse evolving to live on land than back to the water. They also didn't exist (nor did any mammal) at the time animal life first transitioned onto land.
The oldest known species to live on land was an arthropod known as Pneumodesmus newmani which lived some 428 million years ago. The first arthropods on land one source was saying 510 million years ago and another is saying 450 million years ago. give the two I would go with the 450 mya to be the more likely one to be accurate. So that about 22-82 million years to make the full transition.
'aight macfan, i just would like to know exactly how you think evolution works. And don't say how in a short, mocking way. Explain it how you seriously understand it.
I will say EVILution in a short mocking way (i already did). Now i will say seriously how I understand it. So evolution (as i call it "evilution" is a false idea about how everything came together. It involves natural selection, mutations. So basically it means that a fox or something evolved into a whale (impossible). Or a seal into a bird. Or something like that.
You didn't explain anything in that post (ignoring the fact that the first two posts were just mocking it). How do you think natural selection and mutations work. You're last sentence "Or something like that" pretty much shows you don't know how it works.
Evolution scientists (not following the definition of science themselves) aren't even sure who some animals evolved from. I will clearly mark this out. EVILUTION IS A THEORY NOT FACT! IT IS NOT EVEN SCIENCE! IT IS NOT SCIENTIFIC! Their scientists are busy arguing about the ancestors of each animal. On the other hand Creation scientists all agree that God made everything. Oh ya. United we stand, divided we fall.
Evolution scientists (not following the definition of science themselves)
Really? Because last i checked, science worked off of facts and observations, like the ones behind evolution.
EVILUTION IS A THEORY NOT FACT! IT IS NOT EVEN SCIENCE! IT IS NOT SCIENTIFIC
A theory in science doesn't hold the same definition as a theory in any other sense. In science, unless something can be proven in every possible situation at any place in the universe, scientist will still call it a theory. The theory of relativity is still a theory, and yet nobody can disprove it and anyone can prove it.
On the other hand Creation scientists all agree that God made everything
... There's not such thing as a creationist scientist, that's pretty much an oxymoron.
Lastly, you still never explained how you think natural selection and mutations work, perhaps because you don't know?
Where are all the transitional fossils (a.k.a. missing links)? Well here are some examples. While not all direct ancestors they do help to represent the evolutionary step to the next form.
invertebrate-vertebrate 1. Pikaia gracilens (get a back bone man...) 2. Conodont 3. Haikouichthys 4. Arandaspis prionotolepis (it's a fish)
fish-amphibian 5. Osteolepis 6. Eusthenopteron 7. Panderichthys 8. Tiktaalik 9. Ventastega 10. Elginerpeton 11. Acanthostega 12. Ichthyostega 13. Hynerpeton 14. Tulerpeton (a reptiliomorpha, reptilian like amphibian. Considered one of the first true tetrapods) 15. Pederpes 16. Eryops (semi-aquatic amphibian)
human/primeape evolution 60. Darwinius 61. Apidium 62. Aegyptopithecus 63. Proconsul 64. Pierolapithecus 65. Ardipithecus 66. Australopithecus afarensis 67. Australopithecus africanus 68. Homo habilis 69. Homo erectus 70. Homo heidelbergensis
Homo sapiens (us!)
Considering the difficulty in getting a fossil to form in the first place. What we have found in the fossil record is like looking for a needle in a hay stack, and finding an almost complete sewing kit.
here are all the missing links for your reference, thanks to MageGraywolf
(Davy Jones Laugh) You are the stupidest little boy ever. I take it you're Christian? YOUR GOD IS NOT THE CREATOR OF ALL Your kind belittle other religions, you hate science, yet you take advantage of the modern world, many things in which you abolish! Not to mention, you have stuffed every one of your commandments, especially 'Thou Shalt Not Kill" You did just that during your wonderful crusades! Where, should memory serve me, you tried to take over another country in the name of your deity! You have no right to abolish evolution, as it makes more sense than "creationism"
