. I suggested White History Month and that landed me in retract.
There are already 11 white history months (joke). But in all seriousness, there are actually other "race months", its just that nobody bothers to celebrate them in any meaningful way. So... yeah. But that's all kind of boring stuff, so I'm going to get back to that whole white pride thing.
How an white pride be "bad" when gay pride, black pride, etc is "good"? Well, it all comes back to what it means to be white. Goumas and I had a mini-discussion about this on another thread a while back. You see, not so long ago, "white people" would never refer to themselves as white. The notion of light skinnedness existed, sure, but white people wouldn't typically identify themselves as white. A poor indentured servant would never lump himself into the same class as a rich plantation owner.
But, then, there was this whole civil war thing. And the white, slave owners were by far in the minority (as any southerner will be quick to point out, most southerners in the civil war area were not slave owners). So, how does a slave owner convince these other light-skinned people, who aren't really all that better off than slaves themselves, to fight on their side?
Well, they created the idea of the White race as an unifying concept. Like, you may be poor and landless, but you're white, so you're like me. And these pesky northerners are trying to take away rights that are god given to all white people.
VideoSo, basically, that's what it means to be white. "White Pride" can't really be separated from white power, because the entire origin of whiteness is based on creating an artificial group that is somehow better than other groups.
If you disagree, then tell me: what does it mean to be white? I mean, outside of intense albinism,no one has white skin, so what does it mean? If you mean European, then why not say... European?