Really? Well, I don't see it.
I'll put in italics all the things you've said which are sexist to either males or females and how severe I consider each on a scale of 1-10.
"Females were made to be suitable partners to men. And that's how it's supposed to be." 9/10. Here you are basically saying that women exist solely for the desires of men.
"From coming out of the man's rib, the girl came out of, "her man". Which is also why men are supposed to protect women." 6/10. Here you're implying that women are a man's property, and you're applying gender roles about how a man's duty is to protect a woman.
"since this law also states why a woman leaves her family and goes with her husband." 3/10. Here you're implying that a woman becomes owned or submissive when marrying.
"Sexuality is meant to be a gift between a husband and wife for the purpose of babies and bonding." 8/10. Pretty much just equated both sexes to breeding stock.
Read my entire post.
I have. I understand what you're saying, but I'm not seeing how you're drawing the conclusions for what you're saying in a lot of places.
Neither is raping. That means it's okay?
By definition there is a victim in ****. One person is non consenting.
Sexuality is meant to be a gift between a husband and wife for the purpose of babies and bonding.
So if one of the partner's is infertile, their relationship is invalid?
When it's taken out of that context, the gift is degraded and, in the case of masturbation, altogether ceases being a gift.
"Out of context?" Homosexuality IS a sexuality. That's why it's in the word. Also, I'm not sure I like the connotation of gift when applied to this statement...
The purpose of sexuality is gone,
Refer to the above. If one or both partners in a couple are infertile, does that make their relationship invalid?
because the center of the sexual act becomes âmeâ instead of âwe,â and the person is trained to look to himself for sexual fulfillment.
1) Homosexuality requires more than one person. There's still a "we" component.
2) I'm not seeing what's wrong with there being a "me" component to sexual acts either.
The gift of sexuality is misused for the sake of lifeless pleasure.
I take it from what you're saying that you think having sex for any reason other than to reproduce specifically is a sin? What's wrong with pleasure?
Then believe in laws. Even though they're the exact same thing, and there's no proof against that, go do what you want.
I do think laws are important. They aren't the exact same thing either. Sin implies judgement passed down on us from some higher being, laws are things we apply to ourselves for the benefit of all.
If you're gonna be mean, I can just shut up. I didn't come here to fight people.
I'm not being mean, I am simply refuting what you're saying. This is a debate section, if you aren't comfortable with your views being challenged then this probably isn't a good place for you to stick around.