Wow, my argument's getting picked at a lot here. Surprised...
What I notice is that frequently, those people ranting about how unnatural homosexuality is, tend to be those kind of people saying humans are the crown of creation and above nature. Shouldn't homosexuals be a symbol for how humans are not bound to their primal instincts and can love a person even if no own child ensues?
Screw humanity being above nature! No one is above nature. We are all subject to it. I'm a Wiccan-I believe Nature is what a christian calls God. Yes, I do hug trees. I'm not saying gays are incapable of love, its just that if they dont boink a woman, they cant have a kid. Naturally. Excepting adoptions, etc.
1: The purpose of any living being, self-aware or not, is to reproduce so as to continue its existance
I've been in a lot of Western countries and I've been to a lot of Eastern countries. Not once have I ever heard of anyone actually believing in this bull****, educated or otherwise. I've heard the statement before, but no one actually thinks like that, right?
Hey now, no need to get angry and curse. I do. Just disproved you. And i'm sorry, but any SPECIES (as nagged upon on page 89) that does not try to continue its existence goes extinct. We live because and for reproduction. Everything else like civilization and whatnot is secondary. Not unimportant, just...not as important as having a child. Why build this amazing civilization and love everything if you go extinct and can't enjoy it?
Then why is polygamy frowned upon? And what of sterile creatures, such as most ants, that cannot reproduce, yet serve a different purpose?
Lemme revise that. 1: The purpose of any SPECIES is to reproduce, indirectly if not directly, in order to sustain their existence.
As for Polygamy, i'm fine with that. since you're still doing it with the opposite gender, it's alright. Even if your Hugh Heffner, yknow, the playboy king.
Hey now, no need to get angry and curse. I do. Just disproved you. And i'm sorry, but any SPECIES (as nagged upon on page 89) that does not try to continue its existence goes extinct. We live because and for reproduction. Everything else like civilization and whatnot is secondary. Not unimportant, just...not as important as having a child.
but it goes wrong when you do things that wasn't supposed to be like hurting each other and so on.
Usually such things are consentual in both homo and hetero relationships. In either, unconsented is considered abuse/assault/****, depending on the sevarity.
Abuse is NEVER right. I'd rather have consentual homo than abusive hetero. Of course i'd also rather have consentual hetero than consentual homo.
4: Because of 3, reproduction is only possible when a man and a woman do the nasty.
What about when it's done through artificial means or surrogates?
Lemme revise that. 4: Because of three, NATURAL reproduction is only possible...yadda yadda yadda. Happy now? Besides, artifical means are not natural. Dont even TRY to dispute that.