Forums → WEPR → Occupy Wall street and their shenanigans
| 60 | 13007 |
- 60 Replies
1) its not what i meant. i meant that this is not the way to share the money. if the state will help the poor to process, it will make a better furute, instead of letting the rich to do it. in my opinion, the state need to soppurt the civiliens.
If the state "helps" the poor by giving them money they didn't work for, they have to take money from the middle class and the rich. The more the government is used to "help" the poor, the more people who remain poor. By allowing people free trade, the only people who remain poor are those who refuse to work.
the problme with USA is that, even if not directly, you criticzed communisem, europe and any socialist yelling "soviet russia was bad", laughing at the france and at the germans, at cuba {wher no one die because he cant affored medical treat} and etc.
In Soviet Russia, there was a constant shortage of resources.
There's an old joke, it goes something like this:
Two women are standing in a bread line in Soviet Russia. One of them says "I hate having to wait 4 hours a day in these **** bread lines!"
The other says "Cheer up comrade, in capitalist America, they don't even have bread lines!"
2) the taxi thing: they need to know that a taxi driver have a drivine license {and that he didnt broke the law}, that his cab is in a good shape {wont dangare other peoples and the passanger and the driver himself}, that he is no dengerose to socity and etc. not anyone with a taxi can start driving peopels. you have to get a taxi driver license.
The taxi drivers all have drivers licenses and there's no issue concerning safety since nobody has had problems with the taxi drivers. The medallions are limited in number, why is that? For years taxi drivers didn't need medallions, now they do? There isn't a problem with taxi service at all! Yet you still buy into the medallion system?
You can't possibly tell me that big businesses are corrupt because they destroy small businesses by providing cheaper and/or better goods and services, then ignore the harm many government laws are causing.
3) i understand the collge prices thing, but this is because the goverment dont act good.
No, you don't understand. I explained it twice.
College isn't just expensive in the US, it's expensive everywhere. When the UK decided that the government can't afford to pay for everyone's college, students flipped out. College prices are an issue, and they're an issue because putting money into a failing system will only allow the system to get worse.
I won't bother explaining it again.
4) i know that in USA everything {almost} is cheaper than in Israel, and you can get rich nuch easier {or at least live good} than in Israel. but still, they can protest for better conditions.
Sure, everyone has a right to free speech, but that doesn't make them right.
its clearly that i am social-democratic and you are capitalits, so this is an argue of ideaoligy. what i tried to say in the start of the tread, is that these peopels dot just riot. they dont do problmes, killing police mans and **** like vandals in rome for fun. they do it to try to make a good future for all of you. dont "hate" them.
There really isn't too much vandalism going on with these protests that I'm aware of. However, I can't support their crimes regardless of their views, especially when their views are flawed. Even if they have good intentions, I can still hate them for trying to force me to abide by their rules.
peopels are starveing dude. peopels get thrown to the streets. sure you have time, but do they?
The only people who starve in America are hose who refuse to work, and even they aren't even starving!