Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club
| 78431 | 47063893 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
- 78,431 Replies
30. Nothing? Allow me to fix that.
Note: Success not guaranteed
31. Does anyone like the new layout thing? IMO the old one was slightly better.
32. Well, I did the fake edit by writting the message with bold letters and size 65
last YAYed one YAY ago by YAY. ->
[b][size=65]last YAYed one YAY ago by YAY.[/size][/b]Edited one infinity ago by PLGuy
33. I can't believe it... I tried BBCode and HTML and the solution was so easy xD
@HahiHa Do we have to reset because of number 29 being not bolded and not in the beginning of the post? There's 5% size text in the beginning.
34. new layout is ok, but Idle categorie ... there is too much Idle games nowadays ... almost no more games to play with, only launch and watch the game plays itself. oh and way less categories in the "more" section stuff
what i like the less is the "opular game, feature game" when opening a "big categorie" i have to scroll down a lot and everytime i switch to next page (even if it is not really new)
35. I think that the fonts on tabs look better now. Do you also have that white space on main pages? Right under the tabs. It looks as something didn't load.
These edits look really like a different font when 100% view is set.
36. Adding another post before going to my English classes. Enjoy it XD
38. Daymit I think that we should really reset the count :-/ The rules are clear, 29 is not bold.
True, the rules are clear on that subject:
No counter may post without a number or make a post without bolding that number if that number is not at the start of the post.
Sorry
1. Can someone tell me why was I listening to super smash bros brawl themes?
Edited in a few minutes by FishPreferred
2
No counter may post without a number or make a post without bolding that number if that number is not at the start of the post.Yeah, but ...
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored.
Yeah, but ...
True, but...
4.0 The count shall be restarted from 1 if:
4.0.1 a counter from the opposing team posts. The opposing team shall make a stopping post to interrupt the count for the counting team. A stopping post is not required to include a number.
1. Resetting, because that "4.0" and "4.0.1" in his post are numbers technically
2.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored.
If we ignored it, we wouldn't have the number 29 anyway :-/ And @sciller45 is certainly not a troll, so we shouldn't ignore his unintentional mistake.
No "spilping".
Isn't that a typo of slipping? Like new counters joining the count and trying not to be noticed (if that makes a minimum sense).
You must be logged in to post a reply!