ForumsGamesshould warfare 1917 have a sequal

50 12672
crazyclive
offline
crazyclive
44 posts
Nomad

should warfare 1917 have a sequal that is in 1945 world war two? i think it would be cool

  • 50 Replies
space20
offline
space20
306 posts
Nomad

jabber is a weird thing to say

Devious
offline
Devious
84 posts
Nomad

Did someone actually suggest that CANADA and France be added to the next game? Really, Canada? What contribution have they ever made to any war? Our Salvation Army could beat them! And France? By the time any battles were fought they had all surrendered and were POW's! There could be an automatic surrender icon with the French flag maybe.


I said this. And Canada sacrificed more men and fought more bravely in WWI then Britain or the united states.

It was the Canadians who took vimy ridge, a vital point that nobody else could capture.

Canada was Vital to WWI and you should not think otherwise.

I think the Canadians would be a great unit to have in the second game.
theone
offline
theone
394 posts
Nomad

Ok you have WWI now do WWII and then Veitnam and so on and so forth.

Devious
offline
Devious
84 posts
Nomad

NO

WWI should be continued for at least one more game.

WWII can come eventually but not immediately.

CederDUDE22
offline
CederDUDE22
186 posts
Nomad

Well I will sum this up now. Of course it needs a sequal. It was a good and addictive game. But it was very short, and a sequal would do good and go very far.

Showing 46-50 of 50