ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78655 56798297
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,655 Replies
abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

23. I use impatience
Very well. I can do good
things with impatience

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

24. Lets try this again.

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

25. Ok. 25. We can do this.

LeoBlazes7
offline
LeoBlazes7
31 posts
Jester

26. is impatience a virtue?

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

27. I now declare it one. May impatience help us to victory!

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,873 posts
Chancellor

28. Won't, however, impatience cause ninjas to spawn?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

29. I think that's laziness and not impatience, of course when ninjas are spawn later than 2 minutes after last number. Refresh doesn't cost anything.

Olaffours
offline
Olaffours
392 posts
Prince

30. impatience doesn't cause ninja, lack of organisation (and laziness) yes. you can do a CT100 from 0 to 100 in 1h with enough people and organization

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

31. Well, lets do that. We have me, Olaffours, PLGuy. We can do this.

Ramit12
offline
Ramit12
2,966 posts
Baron

32. Can I also be included in this?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

34. We can do it whenever you want people. When the time comes you can count me to the team, today you couldn't unfortunately.

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

35. I don't know what time zone you guys are in, so how about we do it 2 hours from now?

Ramit12
offline
Ramit12
2,966 posts
Baron

37. I'm currently watching the Super Bowl LII right now.

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

38. Is is good? I don't watch football.

puffle1
offline
puffle1
6 posts
Regent

39. I actually think this is the furthest I seen us count to

Showing 70456-70470 of 78655