Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Mods Allowed To Count
| 78406 | 46492815 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
- 78,406 Replies
23. It's good to learn on other people's mistakes, I guess. I can relate to what that team went through. I designed an actual timing chain, fitting into camshafts. There is a good reason you probably won't see that anywhere else made in CATIA than in my model - making it was a self-holocaust. CATIA to other CADs is like C++ to other languages, OK, cool. But ironically, finishing that task in any other parametric CAD would be much faster than in that painstakingly sophisticated in variables monster.
25.
I felt a bit lonely usually, but that happens most of the time because I do crave a lot of attention :C So for now I am searching for something to talk about and someone to talk to
26. Hmm. Someone to talk to, eh? I'd recommend omegle. Plenty of fun people to meet there. Just don't use the cam feature if you don't want to bleach your mind from the horribleness of the humans species.
But! If you're about as profficient at communicating with others as me, I know just what you need!
Cleverbot.
Ah, if I only knew what the hell CATIA and CAD were and why C++ is different from other languages. But I do know one thing. *ahem* Why do programmers wear glasses? 'Cause they can't C#! Hahahahaha. Haha. Hah. Ha.
27. I think we have like 35 more pages to go (to the end) and cleverbot really?
28. C++ is the most advanced language and thus the most powerful. Mastering it, you'll be able to learn any other language quite easily. Here I explain where is the similarity between my endeavor and Stardock's failure: The problem I mentioned wasn't really directly because of the advancement of CATIA, since all I needed models for were animations, I didn't need all the technical data, which were nevertheless required to proceed. The real problem were the freaking lags, because of all the variables and constraints of a moving chain, its links and parts of the links. And even one of the servers of my university had hiccups playing the mechanism >< So here's mine and Stardock's common problem: aiming too high for equipment's limits.
Befriending a Cleverbot? Or maybe going for a more serious relationship? xD Still, sounds more achievable than my dreams of Folorunsho *melancholic sigh*
30. Am I the only one that has to like go to the last page and slowly go to 4945< ?
31.
As expected from the kitty cat > w <
Currently contemplating about what to do at the moment :C I do want to chat with Kat sometimes
32. @Magic_Spoon there is a problem with invisible posts for months now that just won't be fixed. To avoid searching for the last page, it's good to click "last post" on forum games.
33. Ah, yes. @AmyClyne you can find Kat occasionally wandering around the official AG discord server.
35. The only parties that are not too loud are those that you take part in.
36. So if a party is quiet, does that mean it's not in fact a party?
37. There are parties that involves not making a lot of noise, like a movie night, netflix and chill, etc.. Imo, I think that still qualifies as an actual party, just different settings.
39. A netflix and chill party? But a party ain't no fun without noise. So a noisy netflix and chill party with lots of people. Ah perfect. I already hate it!
But what kind of party is it that can't be noisy? A dinner party, that's what! Let's be honest, when was the last time you enjoyed such a party? Meeting your love's parents? Yeah, we all know how fun that is. Trying to make talk while they judge your tiniest movements and most hidden manners (or, better say, vices). I mean, sure, you may grow quite close to your soon to be father-in-law, but after you see your soon to be mother-in-law...
Why is that even called a party? It's more of an audition with someone who doubts you at first and another dead set to smother you.
@mspgamer12345 You got it right, don't worry.
You must be logged in to post a reply!