ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78431 47069589
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

9. i have to go now, this is my last post of today, so, bye, CIA

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

ne::zero10) Two pages for the entirety of Sunday. I'm dissapointed.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

11. Being disappointed leads you nowhere, and only brings you back.

Anders123456
offline
Anders123456
161 posts
Peasant

12. @SirLegendary - I looked back, and thanks for the input on changing of username. Not many people here know me very well, unlike other forums.... besides, the username I want is taken
@Darkfire45 yes, I knew that you need 250 quests to change username. Thanks!
My edit wasn't about the number, mods. It was adding info about the username thing.

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

1. The reason for the edit doesn't matter for count purposes.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

2. Can we make a win this time?

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

3. The more of the same wishes you make, the less chances that it'll actually occur.

Gogotank
offline
Gogotank
3,165 posts
Lord

4. 1 page in 12 hours. We're progressing!

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

5. Yup, we always are progressing 1% with every post. (Theoratically!)

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

:six6) I have Monday off so I should be able to get on the count more.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

7. Finally, there is resumption!

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

8. Don't believe in me! Believe in the me who believes in you!

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

9. Which isn't you apparently.

SirPuddington
offline
SirPuddington
202 posts
Treasurer

10.
100 posts > 1 minute per minute (a lot of double checking is required) that's around 2 hours for us to get from 1 to 100.

The issue isn't just inactivity but laziness... And inactivity.
Lets hope we can do it today. =)

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

ne:ne: (11) - I don't think you'll count to 100 in an hour, will you?

Good, thanks.

Showing 44551-44565 of 78431