ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78397 46189034
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,397 Replies
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,987 posts
Grand Duke

65. We're nearly 2/3 there, let's go guys.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

66. Ohooohoooo! Were (a third) of the way there! Living on a prayer!

GhostOfMatrix
offline
GhostOfMatrix
15,622 posts
Herald

67. Great to be along for the journey.

rida2012
offline
rida2012
25 posts
Justiciar

68.this is taking some time to finish

HalRazor
offline
HalRazor
161 posts
Grand Duke

69. Counting will never finish! The sysiphus-rock rolls down again and again. But yes, we are getting closer to our next ascension.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

70. ****, Yall are active.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

71. I wonder who will finish the count this time.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

72. I hope its someone who has contributed to the count and not someone random.

B2B

Solas128
offline
Solas128
144 posts
Scribe

73. I mean then again, if it was a random who finished the count, at least they'd know they got extremely lucky by barely doing anything at all to get the Count to 100 quest.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

74. Honestly if you only make one or two or three comments you Don't really deserve the quest, any more and at that point you actually helped out.

For the millionth time B2B!

rida2012
offline
rida2012
25 posts
Justiciar

75. who wanna join the discord to speed this things up

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

76. For the love of god please stop begging for us to hurry up so you can get more quests.
Would be funny if we all just stopped commenting.

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,987 posts
Grand Duke

77. What if Hahiha trolled us at number 99.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,854 posts
Justiciar

78. Oh yeah? I could do it sooner! I could troll you at number 98!

Actually, I couldn't... Actually, I could! Depends on your cumulative knowledge of the mighty rulebook.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
314 posts
Bard

79. Actually, It wouldn't matter! if you make a count that I can't tell is wrong or right I can just pretend that its good so if it is I didn't ruin the count but if its wrong then we were screwed over anyway.

Showing 77671-77685 of 78397