ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78643 56308447
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,643 Replies
admintato1987
offline
admintato1987
4 posts
Blacksmith

There's so many comments that I cant get the current ones to load... is this still going?

admintato1987
offline
admintato1987
4 posts
Blacksmith

45. Seems it still is, ignore my earlier comment then, please.

UnleashedUponMankind
offline
UnleashedUponMankind
7,043 posts
Grand Duke

1. Well, because of all the thingys lately... let's start over.

RebelGamer_98
offline
RebelGamer_98
347 posts
Treasurer

1. Yeah, things have gotten pretty crazy on this forum these past few days.

Lea420
offline
Lea420
130 posts
Templar

2. Noooo !!! Not Again !!! I'm Going to Kill Myself 🙂

HalRazor
offline
HalRazor
201 posts
Grand Duke

3. Uaaaaargh!!! But yes, the last two days were very crazy. @adminato1987 , @logogogo @cadenrcr2: Please read the rules. The most important ones: Your post must start with the correct number. It must contain a message (no spam). You may not send two consecutive posts, after your posts another player has to say something. And there's a P1 P2 P1 P3-Rule: You may not answer if the last post was and answer to your post. Read the complete rules, there are some more. Or we have to restart again...

cadenrcr2
offline
cadenrcr2
2 posts
Scribe

3 this just shows no one can cooperate on the interwebs

Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

4. Looks the the mods were unleashed upon some newbies.....

Hunter902
offline
Hunter902
243 posts
Scribe

5. Eh, it was going to happen sometime soon and it gives us a fresh start from all the craziness so far.

sciller45
online
sciller45
2,872 posts
Chancellor

6. People can cooperate on teh interwebz. We wouldn't've done it 45 times before if we couldn't cooperate.

Gotta say, I really love the fact I predicted the future.

I doubt it's intentional. More of a guy not knowing what he's doing. Which is fair.

I wonder... Why not just make the "Last" button do the same thing as the "last post" button on the forum? Folks probably don't even know what happened...

And wouldn't you know it, that same thing happened to @admintato1987 . I still say that clicking on a forum post should bring you to the last post instead of the very first one.

I reckon GhostLoganMartin was banned for trolling, then. A shame... Didn't he help with the count before?

admintato1987
offline
admintato1987
4 posts
Blacksmith

3. Oh dear, let's not do that now.

admintato1987
offline
admintato1987
4 posts
Blacksmith

can we ignore that or- comments didn't bother to load

HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
8,255 posts
Regent

1. Can't ignore a regular mistake, nah. Although, a quick look at the top of the page and you'll see this run was doomed already anyway ;-)

@sciller45 He did, which is why I tried to reason with him. The result is that his account disappeared - I reckon he must've deleted it. A shame indeed...

sciller45
online
sciller45
2,872 posts
Chancellor

1. Oh, I see.

Dang. And here I thought I mastered the art of comparing numbers in Paper, Please...

@admintato1987 . If you see this, right next to the link to the count to 100, there's a button that says "last post". Click on THAT one. The indexing won't fix itself, so you better get used to it.

Lea420
offline
Lea420
130 posts
Templar

2. Why we can't reach 100 ? why ? 😞

Showing 75481-75495 of 78643