ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78643 56226017
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,643 Replies
disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

1. Start again only to fail

Solas128
offline
Solas128
147 posts
Bard

2. Well whatever, You learn from mistakes. Besides, I started today so it's not a big loss.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
361 posts
Bard

3. "I started today so it's not a big loss." Yeah a 65 count lost to someone who doesn't know how to read the rules. Yup NO PROBLEM AT ALL!

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

4. Well it might not be a big loss for you, but I personally feel like Charlie Brown when his kite got eaten. "AAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!" EVERYONE READ THE RULES CAREFULLY UPFRONT!!! That being said you're not in hell yet so we'll still welcome you to the count , but you'll probably want to see a priest for Confession just in case. (If I remember correctly, 65 is the closest I've ever gotten before and the only time I passed 50 out of roughly half a dozen previous failed attempts.)

Solas128
offline
Solas128
147 posts
Bard

5. I am sorry for ruining the count, I didn't mean to. Widestinger don't be rude and saint_of_gaming thank you for welcoming me to this thread.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

6. Glad to have you here now. We can always use one more counter to make the process go faster.

Solas128
offline
Solas128
147 posts
Bard

7. Thank you! The more people we have the better! :}

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

1. Wow, you suck badly. Came back only to insult you. Didn't learn how to read in school, did you?

Solas128
offline
Solas128
147 posts
Bard

2. Seriously dude? you are very rude my guy.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

3. Just keep trying and remember no "4-hit tennis". Also, in the reading department, this website also has an explicit rule against "noob-bashing".

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
361 posts
Bard

4. That's true but it doesn't hurt to read the rules.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,832 posts
Chamberlain

5. I'm detecting a lot of unnecessary hostility around here

Solas128
offline
Solas128
147 posts
Bard

6. I get that I didn't read all the rules, but you don't gotta insult me and remind me about it disastermaster30.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
361 posts
Bard

7. Its fineeeeeeeeeeeeeeee just people really need to read the rules.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

8. My point was an ironic one condemning hypocrisy. Of course I don't want the count spoiled.

Showing 76081-76095 of 78643