ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78654 56727874
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,654 Replies
sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,873 posts
Chancellor

49. First We Feast or Red Hot Pepper Gaming is funny for the first few times? Not that it matters as I'm going to check both out.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

50. He meant RHPG, First We Feast is live all the time. Bald guy and his sauces is the best part of that channel.

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

51. Do they add more bacon strips and Jack Daniels Sauce as well?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

52. I don't know, on all the episodes I've seen they were eating chicken wings with sauces from 2K to 2M on Scoville Scale. Daymit I wanna try that Jack Daniels Sauce.

oyaji3211
offline
oyaji3211
258 posts
Herald

53. I work for a KFC supplier and yesterday we got a shipment of fresh chicken that was killed on Halloween. So I was wondering if thousands of chicken ghosts were going to come back to haunt us.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

54. If you do wake up as a chicken, I'm sure that'll answer your question.

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

55. Just posting before hitting the sack

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

56. What did the sack ever do to you to deserve being hit?

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,873 posts
Chancellor

57. Yeah, what did the sack ever do to you!? And how can you be so gleeful when you hit someone? I vote that @PHLHimself is a psycho.

zdrk
offline
zdrk
285 posts
King

58. Oh, I haven't seen this fine of a count in a while. I'll give my contribution

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

59. @PHLHimself didn't come back from the session... I think that this time the sack paid him back.

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

60. Don't worry, my sack and I go way back.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,873 posts
Chancellor

61. A history of abuse, eh? That poor ol' sack. Anyways, why do people start counting only when the count is over about 50?

zdrk
offline
zdrk
285 posts
King

62. It's just mathematical. Succession percentage is a lot greater :P

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

63. He just ran against the door. That's it! My sack trusts me. Don't you sack?

Showing 68221-68235 of 78654