ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78643 56255630
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,643 Replies
akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

37. I have a test today...

red303
offline
red303
7,572 posts
Shepherd

:eight38) Good luck then.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(39) - I have already had two tests today and I'm going to have another one.

Andelhofs
offline
Andelhofs
743 posts
King

40. if we work together we can manage it easily..

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

41. There appears to be a fluctuation in the count.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

1. Hey, it could be worse. We could be at zero.

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

2. We're already 1/50 of the way there!

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(3) - this would be a winning number! Erm, in case that mods had finished the count 34 times in a row.

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

4. This post marks the completion of 1/25 of the count.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

5. And my axe! Not that I have an axe to begin with anyway.

philimaster
offline
philimaster
491 posts
Peasant

6. why are people writing small...

Frank_Frooton
offline
Frank_Frooton
4,002 posts
Bard

7. the writing small started to look like it said "last edited..."

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

·pɹɐɥ sᴉ ᵷuᴉʇᴉɹᴍ uᴍop-ǝpᴉsdn ǝsnɐᴐǝq ·8

UnleashedUponMankind
offline
UnleashedUponMankind
7,043 posts
Grand Duke

We could be at zero.

1. Granted

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

ne: (1) no, we are at 1 now, Unleashed

Showing 49936-49950 of 78643