ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78642 56129582
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,642 Replies
akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

6. I am back too....

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(7) YAY!
also

I object about the objection of the objects!

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

8. All these objections are lacking in objectivity. In other news, 8!

wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

IX. Wait... Aren't Objections Objectively Objective?

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

ne: (10) no, when objects object, their objections are objectively objective, but if it's not an object, objections are never objectively objective

PixelDude
offline
PixelDude
329 posts
Blacksmith

11. i liek tertles

wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

XII. Yes you do son. Yes you do

UnleashedUponMankind
offline
UnleashedUponMankind
7,043 posts
Grand Duke

1. Yes... no... maybe... or maybe not?

wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

I. We are not completing another count any time soon are we?

Alp_Ehni
offline
Alp_Ehni
315 posts
Farmer

Dul. <---- (That's a Korean number.) Hey, let's be happy with the one we got.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(3) - you mean 둘. And it's advised to include an arabic number in parentheses.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

4. We call this Naalakku.

Crickster
offline
Crickster
1,795 posts
Blacksmith

4. um........ something. (i have no idea on what to say anymore)

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

1. Double Counting. So, reset.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

2. Good call.

How are you all today?

Showing 50581-50595 of 78642