The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
78619 | 55171292 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
13. If you did that on purpose then we can ignore you. Hey, PL, I got you 13!
1 (14) - International Society for Stickman Rights v. Guy:
After careful examination of evidence the jury unanimously decided that the blades responsible for harming Mr. Blue indeed hadn't fully retracted by the moment Mr. Guy forced him to pass through them. Therefore Mr. Guy is fully to blame for Mr. Blue's death and emotional trauma associated with it, precisely as with the other 1496 deaths.
The jury didn't find Mr. Tasselfoot and Massive Monster Ltd. guilty of violating any workplace safety and health regulations. No metal briefcases were seen changing hands. Ungrounded accusations of bribery may lead to defamation lawsuits from the accused parties.
... or maybe the Illuminati were behind it all along?
15. Ok i apologize for being a jerk let's continue and if i ninja'd someone i am so sorry
17. @helpo1 OBJECTION! These are 2 different images in different times! You can see that on the left the second image has blood splattered all over and on the first a bit less!
1 (18) - overruled. The point of comparing photographs is that they must be different for any difference to be visible - in this case, the not-yet-retracted blades in the moment immediately before Mr. Blue's violent demise; shown below in red circles on both photographs. They weren't drawn on the original evidence so they would be fully visible.
19. What is going on. And why are we talking about give up 2.
The jury didn't find Mr. Tasselfoot and Massive Monster Ltd. guilty of violating any workplace safety and health regulations.
the not-yet-retracted blades in the moment immediately before Mr. Blue's violent demise
Though being not able neither to defend myself and prove my innocence nor to persuade the public defender to start defending me (How much did they give you Majestic? -_-) I mindfully admit my fault. Hangman, do thy duty!
(22) - the defendant most obviously hasn't read the full lawsuit and his lawyers are morons since they didn't tell him this was a civil case. Fortunately for him, since the injured party is effectively immortal, this was merely an IIED case and the defendant merely has to recompense the injured party for the aforementioned 1497 deaths. The jury set the compensation rate per death to $1000.
If the defendant cannot pay the compensation, he will be sentenced to debtors' prison to work off his debt.
The joys of medieval-themed websites.
23. it's been some time I don't post here... did I miss anything?
24. Well that seems surprisingly mild. It still isn't fair though. I can't say that I recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an extreme and outrageous way when controling Mr Blue. Your Honor, you have to admit that my intentions were high-minded. All I wanted to do is to get Mr Blue out of his misery - the Tartarus alike level designed by mentioned psychopaths or like Your Honor called them: "the people responsible for workplace safety and health regulations".
Your Honor, also introduced evidences were proving my innocence, they have just been presented as facts proving my guilt by opposing advocates. This whole hearing is a nonsense. And I can’t win the case vs. Tasselfoot & Ltd. who evidently are responsible for violent and sudden demises of Mr Blue and therefore should pay the compensation. What a simple human being like me can accomplish when fighting with a whole system?
Let's do this my way: since nobody knows my personal data I just say #censored ******* *** ***** #stillcensored ****** ******** ***** #anothercensoredwords ******* ****** **** *********** to the jury and I quit this imaginary court.
Oh I almost forgot: the evidence about death count is not reliable. The number of caused deaths is without fail lower! Nevertheless not much lower...
@armorplayergc I have to check that Antichromatic that you recommended, because I like such games but I need to rest from Give Up 2 xD BTW when I played through Bonus E for the first time I also had alot of deaths.
(25) -
I can't say that I recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an extreme and outrageous way when controling Mr Blue. All I wanted to do is to get Mr Blue out of his misery - the Tartarus alike level designed by mentioned psychopaths or like Your Honor called them: "the people responsible for workplace safety and health regulations".
>Killing ImaginaryCourt.exe
26. I'm posting this because helpo asked me to, he said he wanted to make an "addendum" to his last post
You must be logged in to post a reply!