ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78606 54877066
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,606 Replies
TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

15. I'm back and ready to kill any significant progress yet again!

Termitenanton
offline
Termitenanton
2 posts
Justiciar

16

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

1. You haven't read the rules then have you?

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

2. Asking a user. Do we have to start over or is it ok to go on?

@Termitenanton A site rule *as well as a game rule* is that you have to post something, just the number is against the rules.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Treasurer

3. A number by itself from a new user doesn't reset the count according to the following rule:

3.3 No spilping. Spilping is posting without fully reading the simplified rules in the first post of the "Count to 100" thread. While this may be disruptive, it will not reset the count except in the manner outlined in section 3.0. Users new to the count shall post "I'm new and here to count to 100."
TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

4. Thought not, which is why I posted 16 first. But would that mean that we would skip his number or keep on going with that in it?

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

Sure it resets. Section 3.0 outlines the ways in which the count resets and posting just the number is one of them.

Edit: It's supposed to be 4.0. I need to update the numbers.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

1. See I read the rules.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

2. Very well then. Thank you for posting here just this once, rabbit.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

3. Who doesnt?

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

1. well that was quick.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

2. Nice to see a little conformation from Gantic.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Treasurer

3. Let's avoid the infinite 1 loop.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

4. Sorry, i blame a slow computer.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,822 posts
Chamberlain

5. Well we made it to five, usually if we can make it past 15 we're good for awhile.

Showing 17701-17715 of 78606