ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78659 56828654
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,659 Replies
helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

69 - pretty close? 96 would be pretty close.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

70. why did you highlight 69? hahahaha

randomblah
offline
randomblah
246 posts
King

71. Counting 30 more numbers should only take 1-2 hours if we keep moving.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

72. It can take less time than that.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

73. FOCUS EVERYONE

randomblah
offline
randomblah
246 posts
King

74. Must...suceed

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

75. Our destiny awaits us, grim as it may be.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

76 - LEGEND - because if you're posting more numbers in a post, it's preferred if you'll highlight the count one.

randomblah
offline
randomblah
246 posts
King

77. Yeah, but should be fine, as long as you begin with the counting number

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

78. Should we establish a posting order?

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

79 - if you'll, don't include me there for now, Ernie.

randomblah
offline
randomblah
246 posts
King

80. The thirty second grace period for getting Ninja'd helps a lot; I'd rather go with just posting frequently, especially if newcomers wanna join. Just make sure we're not doing alternating between two people I guess.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

81. just edit real fast, and be vigilant

randomblah
offline
randomblah
246 posts
King

82. Phew, close call there. It's also nice that this particular count is aligned nicely on the page.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

83. My internet has a tendency to shut off randomly in the middle of browsing sessions, so I don't trust myself to be able to edit in time.

Showing 24226-24240 of 78659