ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78618 55091309
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,618 Replies
Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Treasurer

3. Not right now.

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

How does Riptizoid101 reply 30 minutes later calling a burn and ironically fail?

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,231 posts
Jester

1. It's cruel to quash a tiny rebellion with excessive force.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,825 posts
Chamberlain

2. But I think we've all been here long enough to accept that as the reality of this thread

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,231 posts
Jester

3. I'VE DEFEATED PATRICK IN POST COUNT
*maniacal laughter*

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

4. I'm trying to beat pang in post count.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,825 posts
Chamberlain

5. Storm you monster!

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,231 posts
Jester

6. I'll monster you.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,825 posts
Chamberlain

7. No. NO! PLEASE DON'T!

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

8. Sacrifices must be made.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

9. Lay him down on the table!

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,825 posts
Chamberlain

10. Hey. You know, Darkfire's pretty unessential at the moment. And he did practically just volunteer for the part. So let's sacrifice him and avoid all the fuss.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

11. Fine with me.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,825 posts
Chamberlain

13. I'm not really sure but R2 said we needed to sacrifice someone. Well he said that there had to be sacrifices and I made the reasonable assumption that he meant human sacrifice.

UnleashedUponMankind
offline
UnleashedUponMankind
7,043 posts
Grand Duke

Ill go to bed,

Showing 21271-21285 of 78618