ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78397 46188224
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,397 Replies
Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

6. OK. Why is this called Sugar Beans?

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(7) I don't know... well... but to make sugar beans is very easy, you just need beans and sugar

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

8. Sugar does't come from beans. Not normally at least. You should be able to get sugar from beans since they require an energy source to grow into a full plant and that energy source almost certainly is, or can be converted to, sugar.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

9. All that sugar is there to make salt. That way we'll remain salty forever.

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

10. I'm sorry to be annoying but sugars are organic hydrocarbons and salts are ionic substances with table salt being sodium chloride. I don't think that's how it works. Unless you use magic. Or alien technology. Or your imagination.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

ne:ne: (11) in Count to 100, all those ways are allowed by the (un)official laws of the internet physics

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

ne: (13) what about sugar made of beans?

apldeap123
offline
apldeap123
1,708 posts
Farmer

1. We have to restart. Hey, @Swarmlord2 , no double posting is allowed...

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

2. Unnecessary restart. There was no back-to-back posting (ABAB not ABAC) nor was there double posting.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(3) don't worry, apple, we were only at 13...

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(5) OH MY GOD! that is correct, Kat! D:
but what are they trying to hide from us!? it has to be either a VERY serious situation, or a complete joke... but actually... both are the same thing, aren't they?

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

6. We still counting? Geez you guys are so intent on winning.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(7) wow! there's a long time I don't see you here, R2
also, I count for the fun, because I like this FG

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(8) - don't worry, Sugar, we were only at Beans. :P

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(9) you were at Bean's?!
I TOLD YOU THAT YOU WERE NOT ALLOWED TO GO THERE! >:|

Showing 51376-51390 of 78397