ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Challenge of Endurance

76637 34358523
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,910 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) posts if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden posts if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 45 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

44. 100! - October 11, '19 at 08:58 am, 10 users, 23 days 20 hours 57 minutes.
sciller45 (3)[11], charlesjoseph [2], disastermaster30, Bears Bears Bears, robsob20061017, Yellowcat [8], Hunter902 [2], armorplayergc [22], bensonbeagle, meaosome

45. 100! - May 09, '20 at 00:03 am, 13 users, 50 days 6 hours 5 minutes.
disastermaster30 (1)[2], RebelGamer_98, Bears_Bears_Bears [2], red303 [9], Yellowcat (1)[9], armorplayergc [23], ismael6, sciller45 (3)[12], Hunter902 [3], akshobhya [10], GhostOfMatrix [2], lozerfac3, SpiritTaker

  • 76,637 Replies
armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(6) well, I don't know what I could say now...

  • Other Than

  1. testing the lists


  1. let's see
    if it works
    with -1

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(7) - but have you ever thought about using a), b) and c)? :O


  1. just like
  2. this surely
  3. won't work
armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(8) alright, let's see



UnleashedUponMankind
online
UnleashedUponMankind
12,675 posts
Grand Duke

1. Funny new thingys to test... hmmm... but i'll resist... for now

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

ne: (1) why resist? we only live once!

jimmycarlos
offline
jimmycarlos
203 posts
King

2. Everything has changed...

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,388 posts
Herald

4. This feels so weird...

IIxLadyLuckxII
offline
IIxLadyLuckxII
584 posts
Nomad

5. Not only have I returned, but I have returned to a grand change, but let that not deter us but rather drive us onward to victory, for this has gone beyond good and evil, this is a new age!

UnleashedUponMankind
online
UnleashedUponMankind
12,675 posts
Grand Duke

1. Onward? Reminds me on a song by Bolt Thrower... *search in playlist*... bingo!

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,064 posts
Justiciar

1. Do you like this new system or do you want the old one back?

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,388 posts
Herald

2. I could do with the old layout but the reply box (or whatever the hell you call this box I'm typing in) is fine as it is.

Doombreed
offline
Doombreed
7,027 posts
Templar

3. Yup, admittedly the posting field is pretty good. But with the changes implemented so far, soon there will be no CT100. Late edits don't show up and one can always delete his post if he makes a mistake.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(4) - yup. CT1OO is not what it used to be anymore. Honestly, I expected it to be locked.

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,080 posts
Marquis

5. This isn't good. I don't like it

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,388 posts
Herald

6. Maybe implement a no deleting rule but let's be honest, who is even going to follow that rule?

Showing 53536-53550 of 76637

We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing analytics and serving ads.
Learn More