ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78654 56736803
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,654 Replies
Doombreed
offline
Doombreed
7,022 posts
Templar

2. (it is 2 because posts with no numbers should be ignored when counting)

Will all the quest hunters in the room please take the time to read the rules of this game? Thanks

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(3) - Mods, Admins and Admodnerstrators are the bad guys in this game; users, Knights and Wardens are the good guys. The bad guys don't count with the good guys and vice versa.

(RAYOR below.)
So all this time it's just some immature admin going around like a bully at the beach kicking the kids' sandcastle down? Stupid me thought this was a legitimate quest medal on the site, when really it's just some guy living in his parents' basement who gets a woody from his power trip screwing with users... many of which are children.

Thanks for the info Kat.

I hope that coffin dodging oxygen thief falls down the stairs.


@MindCage - whoah, slow down a bit. First thing, like Doom pointed out, this is a game. And this is the way we've played the game, liked the game and beaten the game for years. If you think it is unfair or something, you should've been here months ago when people were actually counting and mods were stopping counts at 90s. And still, we like this game, and as much as we oppose the M&As in this thread, they're the people behind this site. They're doing their jobs very well and I can't say there's a M/A that any long-term, community-experienced user really despises, regardless how many counts he has stopped. And frankly, without them, this game would be long dead already.

... some immature admin...

Well, if anything, that's definitely not Gantic. :P

... screwing with users... many of which are children.

Some of them bigger (or smaller) than others.

And if I were you, I'd be a bit more careful with my wishes to others. You're making for some serious ban-warning-problems here.

dorukayhan
offline
dorukayhan
1,318 posts
Bard

| 4 btw is "rayor" an abbreviation?

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(5) - Read At Your Own Risk.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

6. There is a ninja here.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(7) there was a ninja here

dorukayhan
offline
dorukayhan
1,318 posts
Bard

| 8 [ninjas intensify] i got this! *attacks the ninjas with f5 keycaps*

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(9) it's dangerous to go alone, so you should be careful

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

10. My mistake. It wasn't a ninja. It was an assassin.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

11. Who hired the assassin?

Bluelite88
offline
Bluelite88
16 posts
Jester

12. Probably not me.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

13. Why is this contract signed under your name then?

camy999
offline
camy999
137 posts
Treasurer

14. *Mumble mumble, forgery, mumble mumble*

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

15. So, 'probably not me' is a person?

jimmycarlos
offline
jimmycarlos
204 posts
King

16. Hello Mr. Probably not Me, can i introduce you to my friend Anonny Nonny?

Showing 55306-55320 of 78654