ForumsWEPRWorst War in History

617 113835
Mustang2653
offline
Mustang2653
29 posts
Nomad

I think it would have to be world war 2 because of all the lives that were lost

  • 617 Replies
joao99
offline
joao99
350 posts
Shepherd

Iraq war cuz is the only one I witnessed...cant say much against WW1 or 2 (I wasnt born yet) and Vietnam was pretty cool ( I like when americans get a HUGE lost...They are to cocky so shame on them)

adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Which is exactly why it's a financial crisis.

If there are no finances then the businesses shut down, thus business and financial crash. Which equals the same category.
Well, then after this post I shall cease replying. If you cannot understand the fundamental principles of a two way debate, then there isn't really any point carrying on with you.

How do I not understand the fundamentals of a debate, im on the debate team!? Your the one who keeps replying with the same generic replies that end up meaning nothing. SO if you must, then quit replying.
I'd say his political decisions easily label him as an internationalist. Immigration, especially at that time, was a very minor point.

How was immigration a minor point at this time period? The market was booming causing major economic changes, which lead to black tuesday. Due to poor decisions, by woodrow wilson, the economy dropped to an alltime low. The raging twenties turned into the worst era of american history. Due to the original booming of the market, immigrants were coming in america at a drastic rate.
There was no person Z in my analogy.

Your right, because your analogy didn't cover all the people and their outcomes. You said earlier that the people after Wilson were supposed to clean up his mess, thus person Z.
I feel I should be saying the same to you, since you evidently can't graspe the simplest of analogies

Okay, first your the one who can't have a simple conversation without directing the conversation to another topic which wasn't even being talked about. You can't carry on an educated conversation without asking ignorant questions and leaving. So you need to get off your lazy ass and learn something before you try to make me look like a fool. Your the fool, good sir, laugh out loud.
Good day to you sir

To you too, since you can't back up your claims.
FireflyIV
offline
FireflyIV
3,224 posts
Nomad

If there are no finances then the businesses shut down, thus business and financial crash. Which equals the same category.


Seriously, go get an economics degree, then come back and talk to me. Hell, I'll help you pay for it.

How do I not understand the fundamentals of a debate, im on the debate team!?


I feel desperately sorry for your team mates.

What you said was 'if I don't agree with you, why should I listen to your opinion?' That pretty much goes against the fundamental rules of a debate. If everyone operated like that, there'd be no such thing as debate, just one rant following another.



Your the one who keeps replying with the same generic replies that end up meaning nothing.


Such as?

Due to poor decisions, by woodrow wilson, the economy dropped to an alltime low. The raging twenties turned into the worst era of american history.


Have we not gone over the fact that Wilson left office and died in the early 20s? Thought so.

Your right, because your analogy didn't cover all the people and their outcomes.


Yes it does. You amazingly haven't understood it, despite me having explained it in terms a drunk 4 year old could understand. My analogy doesn't even pertain to Wilson specifically, it is designed to show how your argument was logically unsound.

Okay, first your the one who can't have a simple conversation without directing the conversation to another topic which wasn't even being talked about.


Well, since I was trying to get you to understand the concept of analogies, which are important to my argument, it is entirely relevant. You not being able to see that is yet another demonstration of your ignorance in this matter.

You can't carry on an educated conversation without asking ignorant questions and leaving.


I'm not going to leave, since this is actually getting quite fun. From your reaction, it's as if I'm trolling you, without actually behaving like a troll.

So you need to get off your lazy *** and learn something before you try to make me look like a fool. Your the fool, good sir, laugh out loud.


Oh rest assured, I am laughing at you.

since you can't back up your claims.


That's the pot calling the kettle black.
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Seriously, go get an economics degree, then come back and talk to me. Hell, I'll help you pay for it

Give me the money so I can go get a second one! Puta Del Loco! Chupe un chule en tu madres bano!
I feel desperately sorry for your team mates.

I feel sorry for you considering how ignorant you are and the clear fact that you must have dropped out of high school considering your poor grammar and illiterate conversations.
Yes it does. You amazingly haven't understood it, despite me having explained it in terms a drunk 4 year old could understand. My analogy doesn't even pertain to Wilson specifically, it is designed to show how your argument was logically unsound.

No it doesn't. Only a high school drop out like you would give a four year old alcohol. This quote above shows how unintellectual you actually are. My argument in logically sound in every way possible. Just because you can't understand simple grammar and history of which my five year old child can comprehend, then you need help.
I'm not going to leave, since this is actually getting quite fun. From your reaction, it's as if I'm trolling you, without actually behaving like a troll.

Again, another statement showing how ignorant you are. I'm actually proud of you at the current moment. You can spell troll. I put it in bold letter so you could remember how to spell it.
Oh rest assured, I am laughing at you

Oh, rest assured the general public is laughing at you everytime you get off your mothers couch to recieve your unemployment check.
That's the pot calling the kettle black.

Oh, you understand what an analogue is. Thats quite interesting. I have backed up every claim that I have stated and you have yet to back up one. Shame on you.
You need to get your morbidly obese ass off the couch and get a job. Instead of wasting time and money on the internet. You don't need to be on the internet if you can't back up a simple claim and if you are as unintelligent as you are acting at the current moment. I bet your a 40 year old virgin, haven't have any action, and never will! Thats just down right hilarious to me.
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Such as?

Well... lets think.
Such as?

rest assured

I'm going to leave

Seriously

Do I need to say more?
Have we not gone over the fact that Wilson left office and died in the early 20s? Thought so.

Actually wilson was a cause of the depression, now I have to go because I have a life. Ill be back though.
FireflyIV
offline
FireflyIV
3,224 posts
Nomad

Give me the money so I can go get a second one! Puta Del Loco! Chupe un chule en tu madres bano!


A 16 year old with a degree. What do you take me for?

I feel sorry for you considering how ignorant you are and the clear fact that you must have dropped out of high school considering your poor grammar and illiterate conversations.


I guess having done A2 levels and having a bachelors does not pass the scrutiny from a 16 year. Out of interest, would you kindly find an example of me using incorrect spelling and grammar? If you make accusations like that you better be able to provide evidence. Have some, show it. Have none, shut it.

No it doesn't.


Seeing as I was the one who formulated it, I understand its purpose. Infinitely better than you at any rate.

My argument in logically sound in every way possible.


Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Besides, your posts have proven otherwise.

Just because you can't understand simple grammar and history of which my five year old child can comprehend, then you need help.


1)Personal attacks. Very mature of you I must say.
2)For you to have a 5 year old son, you'd have to conceived it at the age of 11. Besides the fact that is downright illegal, it is also highly unlikely.

Again, another statement showing how ignorant you are. I'm actually proud of you at the current moment. You can spell troll. I put it in bold letter so you could remember how to spell it.


Surprise surprise. Another personal attack. How novel of you. I'm also loving the irony of your response to the passage you quoted. You actually replied by trolling. I can't believe you fell for that.

Oh, rest assured the general public is laughing at you everytime you get off your mothers couch to recieve your unemployment check.


So, if I'm not mistaken, that's personal attack #3. There's your hatrick. Any more for any more?

Oh, you understand what an analogue is.


You fail to spell analogy correctly after having accused me of poor spelling and grammar throughout? That's a nice touch.

I have backed up every claim that I have stated and you have yet to back up one. Shame on you.


I would go back and quote all the areas where I have done so, but I get the feeling it'll be a waste of time, seeing as that you were unable to discern that from your first reading, your juvenile refusal to think critically will prevent the outcome from being any different a second time.

You need to get your morbidly obese *** off the couch and get a job.


Personal attack #4. You really have surpassed yourself this time. And all in one post too. This must be some sort of personal best for you.

I bet your a 40 year old virgin, haven't have any action, and never will! Thats just down right hilarious to me.


#5.

Do I need to say more?


Removing single words from their original context and using them as argument I haven't backed up any claims (incidently I've provided more links than you have during this discussion.)

Ill be back though.


Looking forward to it.

Oh and before I forget, am I the only one who finds it hilarious that I am being accused of having poor spelling and grammar by someone who's clearly having trouble with his English?
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Wow, thinking someones age on here is actual shows your true intelligence. Oh, dang he turned from 16 to 89 in a day. I'm just that good. Look in my profile is you can't understand me.

your posts have proven otherwise.

Ditto.
(incidently I've provided more links than you have during this discussion.)

Links don't make up for stupidity. If you want I can send you a worm hole link. How about it?
Oh and before I forget, am I the only one who finds it hilarious that I am being accused of having poor spelling and grammar by someone who's clearly having trouble with his English?

Please go through and quote every grammar mistake I have made. Please and thank you.
#5.

Its just so fun to point out what you actually are.
FireflyIV
offline
FireflyIV
3,224 posts
Nomad

Wow, thinking someones age on here is actual shows your true intelligence. Oh, dang he turned from 16 to 89 in a day. I'm just that good. Look in my profile is you can't understand me.


Funny how you only changed it once I pointed out your age. That doesn't make it seem suspicous at all.

Links don't make up for stupidity. If you want I can send you a worm hole link. How about it?


Seeing as my links were actually relevant to the discussion, the argument that any links provided, no matter the content proves intelligence doesn't really stand up.

Please go through and quote every grammar mistake I have made. Please and thank you.


Sure thing. Anything for a friend.

------

Spelling and grammar mistakes:

im on the debate team!?


Capitalisation.

Your the one who keeps replying with the same generic replies that end up meaning nothing.


'Your'. It's you're with an apostrophe.

Due to poor decisions, by woodrow wilson, the economy dropped to an alltime low.


'Alltime'. There needs to be a space between two separate words.

Okay, first your the one who can't have a simple conversation without directing the conversation to another topic which wasn't even being talked about.


Again, 'your' needs an apostrophe.

I feel sorry for you considering how ignorant you are and the clear fact that you must have dropped out of high school considering your poor grammar and illiterate conversations.


Another 'your'. Quite ironic since this sentence is focused on the subject of correct grammar. Oh, and you can't have an 'illetarate conversation' either.

I'm actually proud of you at the current moment.


The expression is 'at the moment', not 'at the current moment'. If you are going to use expressions like these to insult me, at least use them correctly.

I put it in bold letter so you could remember how to spell it.


Perhaps I should put it in bold letters, so you remember that the plural of 'letter' ends with an 's'.

Oh, rest assured the general public is laughing at you everytime you get off your mothers couch to recieve your unemployment check.


The rule is 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'. In other words, you spelt the word receive incorrectly.

Oh, you understand what an analogue is.


It's spelt 'analogy' not 'analogue'. They are completely different words with completely different meanings.

I bet your a 40 year old virgin,


Another 'your', when it should be 'you're'.

haven't have any action,


It should be haven't 'had', not haven't 'have'.

Thats just down right hilarious to me.


It's 'that's' with an apostrophe.

Wow, thinking someones age on here is actual shows your true intelligence.


1) I never claimed it did.
2) 'Someone's' needs an apostrophe.
3) That sentnece is grammatically incorrect at so many levels, the fact you didn't spot it the first time round is a stellar example of how you have difficulty with English language sentence structures.

Ill be back though.


It's I'll', not 'Ill'.

-------

And that's just from 4 posts of yours. Do you want me to continue, or have you had enough?
AlexPaint
offline
AlexPaint
12 posts
Nomad

World War 2, or "The Great Motherland Defence" in post-soviet countries. Maybe some of you think that U.S. military won it. My grandfather often tells me about defending Leningrad and lots of his friends died during this fight. But all members of coalition played it's own important part

samwynter
offline
samwynter
80 posts
Nomad

civil war because the the lives lost were American. otherwise, WW2

tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

civil war because the the lives lost were American.


So what?
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

@FireflyIV, don't troll me bro'!!!!

FireflyIV
offline
FireflyIV
3,224 posts
Nomad

@FireflyIV, don't troll me bro'!!!!


I'm sorry you consider that last post trolling, but please bear in mind, you did ask me to point out your spelling mistakes. Don't be mad that I obliged.
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

No, I thought it would be fun to say what was stated above. @FireflyIV, don't oblige me bro!
LOL

Bloodscum
offline
Bloodscum
115 posts
Nomad

Heheh, this is an entertaining argument.

I agree with firefly that WWII was caused by WWI and the economic instability that followed.

Showing 496-510 of 617