I haven't been on much lately so I decided I would post my own topic. I don't believe this topic has been done recently since I checked the stickied thread with topics. I will state my reasons on why I believe the death penalty should be put in place for all murderers. It is fine if you disagree but let's make this a good and clean debate. Don't just say "You are wrong." Alright, well here I go.
1) I will start off by saying that the death penalty (that is only for mass murderers) was recently stopped because they said the method was too painful. So, someone who brutally murdered one or more people should die besides feeling the same pain? Where is the justice in that? I believe that you should get what you give. If you do good deeds, then you should be rewarded nicely. If you kill someone, you should be killed.
2) The next part I will go into is jail. Oh yes, we make jail seem like the worst place possible. Bed, toilet, workout room, safety, and 3 square meals per day. Now, safety is different in different jails. I know that so it can't exactly be supported. However, why do we give them a workout room or some sort of a place to lift weights? I am curious to this. Okay, so we are making rapists stronger and making it easier for them to rape when they get out. Why do they need 3 square meals per day? I went to a soup kitchen last year and I almost cried at how many homeless walked in because they didn't have anything to eat. We are treating criminals better than people who never harmed anyone. Where is the justice in that? Don't tell me the homeless made bad choices because it can happen to anyone. Also, bad choices? What about the person who chose to kill someone? I think that angers me the most. Really, jail looks like heaven to some people so they hurt someone else.
3) I will go into the issue of money. It costs us around $30,000 per year to take care of ONE convict. Now, I am just supporting the death penalty for murderers. The people who never harmed anyone are taking care of people who killed other people. What is wrong with this picture? We are taking care of them instead of the poor who never hurt people. That money could go to so many good issues like cures and health care. I will say the green movement just for you, Carlie. Anyways, now you will say it costs too much to use the death penalty. I think we should kill the murderer the exact same way the murderer killed someone else. This leads me into my next point.
4) Can you imagine going through the pain of being killed? Let's take it through the victim's point of view. Can you imagine the torture of what happened before you died? The pain would be terrible if the murderer stabbed the victim 100 times. I know the victim would die before that but it shows a point. That is why I believe the murderer should be killed the same way. Let them feel what it is like to go through that. Now, let's take it through the family's point of view. Your relative was just murdered. Now, be honest, what would you like to happen to the person that killed them? You would most likely want them dead which is why the death penalty should be put in place.
5) I know we can't be 100% sure of who the murderer was. However, DNA is 99.99% so very close. Also, why would their DNA even be on the victim or around the scene of the crime? They most likely had something to do with it. That makes them eligible to receive the death penalty. Also, the people we are not sure of can be put in jail. Jails are over filling so criminals are being released earlier then their original sentences. I know this because my aunt was released about a year before her sentence was completely served.
I will state my final words. I want to make it even more clear that the death penalty should only be given to murderers. The other criminals can be put in jail. The murderer should feel the same pain the victim did. Rotting in jail is a bunch of bull. Yes, to some it is crap while it is heaven to others. Why are we paying for murderers to have a life with food and beds? You would want the murderer of your family member dead. You would not just say they can go to jail. DNA is not exact but it is only .01% possibly wrong. That is pretty darn good. You may say two wrongs don't make a right but that makes no sense at all. So, if someone cheats on a test and is given a failing grade for cheating...would you say that then? The same applies to the death penalty. The death penalty is simply a consequence for their actions.
I would love to debate someone on this issue but please read my whole post before posting. It makes the debate more enjoyable if you post your feelings to each of my points and then state your final words. Thanks and also keep it on topic.
If someone's DNA is found at the crime scene, more then likely, they had something to do with it. Also, you gather the suspects and put them through interrogation to find who is most likely the murderer. Do some more testing with forensics and it should be able to prove who the murderer was.
Killing someone gets them life in prison while robbing only gets them some years. If they want a better life, they can kill someone and not have to worry about a job, taxes, danger, and much more.
Or they could rob somebody the moment that they get out and be sent right back in without having the burden of a death on their conscious for the rest of their life. Without the risk of the death penalty, or putting themselves in danger of their victim killing them in self defense (at least not as great).
Furthermore, DNA found at a crime scene doesn't necessarily relate to the participants as we're shedding tons of genetic evidence all the time and literally anywhere we've been should have at least some remaining for a few days at least. Furthermore, didn't you see the article that I showed talking about how little genetic evidence we actually find?
If a murder occurred in a kitchen at a restaurant, chances are that every employee of that restaurant will have DNA present at the scene of the crime does that make every single one of them the number one suspect?
If a murder occurred in a kitchen at a restaurant, chances are that every employee of that restaurant will have DNA present at the scene of the crime does that make every single one of them the number one suspect?
Don't you think witnesses would be present at the restaurant? That is what I am saying. DNA is not the only thing used in an investigation. Evidence and witnesses are used as well.
I'm for it. But in a humane way. I currently am very agreeable with the needle now. IT's the same as putting a dog to sleep. I think the only people who should get it are 1. Murderers 2. The people who are freaks to children
And I do believe we treat the prisoners way to good. They have it pretty much made. I mean cmon, I saw a show on the history channel where the prisoners where singing the spongebobsquarepants theme. And we've all seen the philpino prison reenacting 'Thriller'. Now to me it's setting the scene that, "If you go to prison, we'll treat you as if nothing happened!" It's crap. I say lets give them three channels News, Religon, and QVC.
I'm for the death penalty but you have to have repeated sick and disgusting offenses like killing, raping, or any other offenses that can affect the victims emotionally, mentally or physically
really Isn't it supposed to be (zero tollerance) What is this 10 years in jail shi* after 10 years they just get out of jail kill someone else then they are back in there! If they do it kill them especially to a child!
