Once you give the means of production to the proletariat, they will then become the next bourgeoisie while trying to keep others below them! They will use their new power to rise to the top. There will be no classless, stateless society! It IS a utopia.
Do you know what the proletariat are?
Lol.
They are the workers, who will be 100% of society.
We call it a democracy.
Yes yes Agent, while ignoring that your Great America got its wealth from exploitation of the third world country you also ignore the definition of communism I posted.
And what is life all about, according to Communism?
Living.
@Agent's last post.
Yes, because of his work, his sons are rich. Pretty much the cycle. The rich being born rich.
For those that become rich, its just dam luck. Of course with a population of 300 million a few are going to be rich.
Just how much of Walton's story is reality? Why need to argue why its not, just look at the dam facts.
About wealth distribution.
Firstly, I find that quite bull. Where did you get such statistics?
How could a homeless even spend $100,000 in a year?
Who would even spend $1 billion on such a study?
How would you even reach a homeless? Put tags on them that they use to study animals in the wild?
And considering these homeless can't buy a home with $100,000, have no job, probably can't get a job better then Macdonalds, I don't know what they are going to do.
Also, communism is no much about a wealth retribution. Its a one time thing, to take away the hands of the capitalists off the production of goods. So I don't see how it becomes a cycle.
But tell me this anyway.
If you gave those homeless a home, would you call them homeless?
One man has created thousands, if not millions of jobs around the world, not to mention lower prices for goods... =)
All Wal-Mart did was outweigh the competition and become the best of others. Your point is only relevant to the capitalist system. Its just a process of the capitalist system, not a natural law. The businesses create profit and create jobs. So?
No one person in a communist society could not set up a Wal Mart...
Not to say people would be dying on the street without Wal Mart, it would just be another store >_> When in need of a store, the society can order its construction.
Btw, the lower cost of goods can be explained by one way:
Greater exploitation of its workers.