The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
697 | 104877 |
Well to start out i dont beleive in evoltuion so the fact that other things cant be taught really ticks me off but i just want to see what people think and why.
Some do yes but creationism has had studies done on it
i agree...but i see what your trying to say and thats not what it is
The last few pages are a bit of a dead end IMO. It seemed already abundantly clear that creationism itself cannot be supported by science as it relies on a set of premises separate from science, so I'm not sure what people are trying to acheive here, if not reasserting the strength of scientific evidence by presuming it (in calling scientific articles "unbiased".)
The last few pages are a bit of a dead end IMO. It seemed already abundantly clear that creationism itself cannot be supported by science as it relies on a set of premises separate from science, so I'm not sure what people are trying to acheive here, if not reasserting the strength of scientific evidence by presuming it (in calling scientific articles "unbiased".)
[/quote]What is Samy? Say your piece. I'll listen.
"I don't agree with a word you say, but to my death I will defend your right to say them." -Voltaire[quote]
I've yet to see any way to test or prove either theory both are based on faith and logic. Also the quote rings true for me as well.
maybe god didnt want us all to be perfect because he didnt want us to rise against him and retaliate. idk why anybody would do that, just a thought...
One attempt at reconciling this I've seen is in fact asserting that perfection would render the relationship between God and mankind pointless.
You can call that either question-begging or theological definition, depending on your premises. Regardless, don't get me started on the number of ways the body could go wrong for no apparent reason!!!
if people wanted to learn about theology in school they would go to private school... thus elaborating on my previous post
Pseudoscience is not science either. Stringing together a bunch of science-sounding giberish does not make facts out of beliefs.
I am not saying perfect. I am saying perfect body. What reason would He have for making our bodies a detriment to our health?
What do you mean, render the relationship pointless?
Dr. Fox's topic was to be "Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education." His source material was derived from a complex but sufficiently understandable scientific article geared to lay readers (5). One of the authors, on two separate occasions, coached the lecturer to present his topic and conduct his question and answer period with an excessive use of double talk, neologisms, non sequiturs, and contradictory statements. All this was to be interspersed with parenthetical humor and meaningless references to unrelated topics.
Something created the universe, be it an explosion of intensely dense matter, or a supernatural being poofing us into existence. Evolution took over from there. It's foolish not to believe in evolution, at all. There is solid proof of evolution, the problem is when we try to use it to explain where we came from. There is not enough to say that humans evolved from this, only theories that say maybe this maybe that.
So I believe it's a combination of both Evolution and Creationism.
That's a fairly good summation, there's just a minor semantic quibble from me:
There is solid proof of evolution
That's a fairly good summation, there's just a minor semantic quibble from me:
There is solid proof of evolution
I think you mean solid evidence.
if you can find one website that gives absolutely solid proof of Evolution
I think that evolution is the most practical theory. But I'm not all against creationism, I believe that every idea should be explored until we get the right answer, and although more and more evidence is coming out for evolution, creationism should not be counted it until there is solid concrete proof.
Therefore it is not so sensible to say "give me one source of evidence that will convince me this is proof" because the strength of that depends on how much evidence there is.
Also I have a question, according to evolution our world should be improving, we should be heading for a perfect world and humanity, our next evolutionary leap. But according to creationism our world is steadily heading for it's on destruction, were getting worse. Turn on the news...which one seems more likely.
You must be logged in to post a reply!