Forums → WEPR → OBAMA vs BUSH
| 72 | 15164 |
- 72 Replies
there's more parties than the dem and rep...liberals is a big one
I once looked up the political parties of the U.S., I was reading for hours.
abortion fits the definition of murder, one human killing another
Abortion is tricky, I can understand if you have an incoming baby and you cannot take care of it nor find a place to give it to, then 'killing' it may be the best thing before it's forced to live on the streets and die later on, but if you're just a teen who has no common sense and is probably going to do it again anyway, then you shouldn't have the right to take away the life of your kid.
i think as far as no one is trying to marry a tree or an inanimate object then it's fine
Just wait until next year, it'll be up there too, don't worry, we've got to move onto their at some point I mean we're the U.S.!
XP
it depends on when the abortion occurs. Abortions after the first trimester should be illegal, but before that the developing baby is not sentient or human, so it would be like putting a rabid chihuahua to sleep. If it is necessary, then you may have to. There is no such thing as pro-abortion, just pro-choice, remember that. I don't want abortipns to happen, but sometimes it is necessary. Also, modern republicans make try to make life difficult for the poor by not giving low-price healthcare, trying to bust unions, abolish the minimum wage, AND abolish welfare, which would mean that the working poor (which there are a lot of!! Most poor people are not getting free rides on welfare, they are working to support their already tough lives) would have no defenses against companies screwing them over and dropping more people under the poverty line. that is how republicans today are trying to make life under the poverty line more hellacious than it already is, and providing no way for those people to get back above the poverty line.
but before that the developing baby is not sentient or human,
as soon as seman hits an egg i call it a baby
low-price healthcare,
that would just be
1. socialism
2. make the nations debt even worse
3. the care would be horrible because it's for everyone
bust unions
unions are what caused ford, general motors, and chrystler to have to get billions of dollars from the government
unions make it so you have to pay the employee even if they're not working
to get back up from poverty for the democrats is to take from the successful and give to the lazy
2% of the rich people inherit their money
you are surely a victim of the media...
here's a fun quote
"If your not a democrat by the time your 20 you have no heart
If your not a republican by the time your 40 you have no brain"
I hate lazy people, and by lazy I mean riding on the backs of others so you can live a nice life while others suffer, hence why Welfare is so messed up right now. Abortion debates will never end, it's just like two thousnad people arguing about the truth to religion.
Giving money to the poor is good, but to the lazy is bad, obviously. The only problem is people are very good at bending things to lift themselves higher, or lower if it benefits in some way. So in my eyes either way, you're just not going to be able to help people at your best because everyone is just so 'grabby' when it comes to money.
You know what's weird though, was thinking about this when I read Graham's post about the successful losing their money. Why do movie stars get paid so much, even if they don't really have to do anything(there are those contracts where they get paid millions just for agreeing to maybe play the part)? I mean it's not like they're saving the world from aliens in real life, they're just entertaining people o_O
I wonder if that's right....of course taking the money from superstars isn't going to save the country's unfortunate, it's just a thought.
This thread is kind off-topic isn't it?
@Graham's quote
Lol, but what if you're neither o_O Are you a mushy puddle by the sidewalk people step on and say 'gross' while scraping you off? That actually is kinda mean >_> Despite the fact it's just a bad joke.
they're just entertaining people o_O
entertainment business is a huge organization because lotsa people pay alot for references to it (this includes sports,movies,tv shows) you know, t-shirts...the theatres the dvds...
@Graham's quote
Lol, but what if you're neither o_O Are you a mushy puddle by the sidewalk people step on and say 'gross' while scraping you off? That actually is kinda mean >_> Despite the fact it's just a bad joke.
to that i use an emoticon
:B
to that i use an emoticon
:B
Okay, then we're the Political Pirates P)
We don't obey the parties, we go with whoever we think will benefit us, then dump them 4 or 8 years later for someone who can get us even better things, Arrggh!
Huh, I read in the papers that some people belive Obama will "blow the torch opean on UFO sightings" Really? Sure it's cool that Obama won, first ever black/African American presedent in the US, but he is NOT god. He will not just throw things out to the public!
everyone knows that bush was a stupid texan that had barley any good ideas, as for obama, we will see if all he said was true in the next couple of months.
Like this idiotic posts , and many others the media hated Bush thus drawing the people of america to do the same - _ -
Ok, i guess people want me to clarify with Clinton.
A: When Afghanistan had Osama Binladin in custody (during Clinton's term), Clinton refused to take him and said he did not want him, Osama then was able to get out and reform and now we have the Taliban and a young and preppy Al Qaida :]
B: He removed racial profiling from the airports so when the two hijackers showed up they got through even though:
-They showed up right before the plane took off.
-They payed in cash.
-They had no luggage.
-They dressed in dark clothing.
-They were foreign.
-They have heavy accents.
All of these things would ordinarily make the security check them out and what not, but because they were foreign, the "No Racial Profiling" rule allowed them to roll through without a background check and all that.
C: He downgraded are military and pulled us out of places.
D: he was an idiot.
i like bush better because i disagree with many of Obama's policies and like many things bush has done such as declaring war on terrorists. Terrorists need to be stopped
Terrorists need to be stopped
Congrats dude, you are one of the people who sees the plain and obvious objective that we must reach :]
Congrats dude, you are one of the people who sees the plain and obvious objective that we must reach :]
Yeah but it's not as simple as people think. You really can't go up to the guy and say; "No bombing places okey?" Beacuse that does not work.
"No bombing places okey?" Beacuse that does not work.
Tell that to Obama please.
And thank you, for helping my case. We cannot stop a worldwide threat without aggression.
You must be logged in to post a reply!