ForumsWEPROwning a Gun?

259 47725
MrMonkey3
offline
MrMonkey3
495 posts
Nomad

On the news, in washington it is illegal to own a gun. I think they should be allowed I mean Murderers are going to be able to get them anyway they're always black markets for them but what about the citizens who can't pro tect them selves???


What do you think???

  • 259 Replies
Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

Except for the part that jail time is real though.


And if you're one of the people who ends up getting shot. That would be rather unpleasant.
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

Well in the near future, people are going to be injected with pain vaccines when they are born, so that wouldn't even matter. The part about remaking muscle cells (whenever THAT'S going to take place) is the tricky part!

{
Guns == protection && == Constitutional Amendment;

For(ResidentialGunCount --)
{
Bootleg ++;
Fear ++;
Death ++;
}

}

It's like programming! All these are fundamental truths.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

people are going to be injected with pain vaccines when they are born, so that wouldn't even matter


The pain part wouldn't, but the death part would. Let's say you got shot right in the head. Chance of survival...?
Karlson
offline
Karlson
76 posts
Shepherd

if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns Remember prohabition. outlaw achool and boom organized crime. now imagen it ten times worse with guns. outlaw guns for criminals only.

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

The pain part wouldn't, but the death part would. Let's say you got shot right in the head. Chance of survival...?


Zero! You just gotta make sure not to hit that part :P

if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns Remember prohabition. outlaw achool and boom organized crime. now imagen it ten times worse with guns. outlaw guns for criminals only.


See program above ^
Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

You just gotta make sure not to hit that part


What if you're the one who gets hit there?
2014631
offline
2014631
1,855 posts
Nomad

Then he's dead. Lol. Hahahaha

STS2012
offline
STS2012
18 posts
Nomad

then your screwed

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

then your screwed

Then he's dead. Lol. Hahahaha


Pretty much Xp We just gotta make sure to keep that as a ru--Where the heck are we going with this?? I don't know if this is on topic or off topic lol
STS2012
offline
STS2012
18 posts
Nomad

its kind of on topic

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

Oh! Forgot to add something to my little program...

{

if(law =/= ConstitutionRules)
{
law == Unconstitutional;
Riots ++;

}

}

So you see, once people realize that their new law is unconstitutional (as they know now), they will riot. The only way for this new law to take effect is if they amend the constitution. This can happen in 3 ways.

STS2012
offline
STS2012
18 posts
Nomad

yeah but probably wont

Dubness2
offline
Dubness2
389 posts
Nomad

yeah but probably wont

Ha. Heck yea they won't. They would lose more money and thats all thats important to the Federal government.
TrainJumpa
offline
TrainJumpa
122 posts
Nomad

It's called the Second Amendment, we have the RIGHT to not just own, but bear arms. And Obama is going to make very hard to own guns, especially with all the taxes he's putting on guns and ammo, but the gun crime will still be the same because criminals, we don't want to have guns, will still get them.

grimml
offline
grimml
879 posts
Nomad

It's called the Second Amendment, we have the RIGHT to not just own, but bear arms.


Yes, but the Second Amendment was written in another time under other circumstances.
There wasn't a real police. People were propably also afraid of the government and guns gave them the guarantee that they could defend themselves and could put pressure on the government.
Nowadays you can picket or strike. The people have the power, not the government. We also have a police.


but the gun crime will still be the same because criminals, we don't want to have guns, will still get them.


1. It would make it much harder for them to get weapons.
2. So why searching the baggage and poeple at the airports? Terrorists will always find a way to get on board with weapons...
Showing 151-165 of 259