I personally believe if sex is a son, or we were not supposed to have it, got would not of made it pleasurable.
Really the only reason people think it is a 'sin" is because you are seeing the other person nude. But if you remember back in "bible times" or back to the time of Adam and Eve, everyone went around nude or basically nude on a regular basis.
Also, if sex is a sin that is only because society has made it so. It's just a part of life, the same as eating or drinking or anything. The only difference is it has consequences, which is why you should use protection. Stupid teens going and having sex un-protected, that's partly why it's such a taboo subject. I'll stop now though, since this thread isn't about unprotected sex.
Ricardo: The (Oh my gosh i cant remember what their called) the rock things that Moesos got. Whatever. #7 says Sex is a gift from god. So he did make it.
I can't remember if Masturbation is a sin or not *awkward silence*......um yeah but I think its ok as long as you wait until you are married and ready.
I'm pretty sure it is, sex is a symbol of your commitment to another person in that you are ready to accept the pain of pregnancy (for the woman, anyway.
I personally believe if sex is a son, or we were not supposed to have it, got would not of made it pleasurable.
God made it pleasureable so we would never want to not have kids. He had made it pain for women to endure in Genesis, if he made no pleasure out of it, people would not have kids to avoid the pain. This way, it balances out so that if you want kids, you get pleasure out of it too.
Really the only reason people think it is a 'sin" is because you are seeing the other person nude. But if you remember back in "bible times" or back to the time of Adam and Eve, everyone went around nude or basically nude on a regular basis.
It's also a sin against the other person's body if you are willing to have sex with more than one person (exclusions would of course include death of wife or husband and divorce). It should be something special shared between people who are going to spend the rest of their lives together. People went around naked back then because there was no shame at all. Once original sin was created, they felt shame and had to hide their bodies, so to speak. Adam and Eve thought they were becoming aware that they were naked, but they were only aware of their shame.
Also, if sex is a sin that is only because society has made it so. It's just a part of life, the same as eating or drinking or anything. The only difference is it has consequences, which is why you should use protection. Stupid teens going and having sex un-protected, that's partly why it's such a taboo subject. I'll stop now though, since this thread isn't about unprotected sex.
I would agree to a certain extent. I still think sex should be between only the married since they aren't going to get out of marriage so easily. If teens must have sex, they should have the sense to get protection. But even the protection fails, actually I read somewhere that 50% of abortions come from failed birth control. So protection is useful, but would not end the taboo on the subject (I assume you meant abortion).
I believe Christians define sex as the commitment between a man and a woman to stay together. Before this commitment can be made you'd need to be married. Also as for homosexuality, sex isn't as big of an issue since you never know if they're doing it, but it should still be between a man and a woman because it's a symbol of commitment, and how committed can two men that cannot ever have kids of their own really be to the responsbilities of each other (not of their relationship, but responsibilities of parenthood). So all in all, I believe sex should be between a man and a woman that are hopefully married (at least engaged, please), and who are ready for children.
BUT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION I'M PRETTY SURE THAT PRE-MARITAL SEX IS NOT A SIN, BUT GOD WANTS TEH 2 PEOPLE TO BE SPIRITUALLY BONDED BEFORE THEY HAVE "IT"
LIKE MY TEACHER SAID ONCE THEY ARE ARE MARRIED THEY CAN HAVE "IT" AS MANY TIMES AS THEY WANT
NOW THIS IS A "DIFFERENT" KIND OF DISCUSSION BUT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION I'M PRETTY SURE THAT PRE-MARITAL SEX IS NOT A SIN, BUT GOD WANTS TEH 2 PEOPLE TO BE SPIRITUALLY BONDED BEFORE THEY HAVE "IT" LIKE MY TEACHER SAID ONCE THEY ARE ARE MARRIED THEY CAN HAVE "IT" AS MANY TIMES AS THEY WANT
Interesting perspective. However, I would argue that nowadays, most people aren't spiritually bonded until they are married, and so long as their relationship can be broken up (I know divorce, but that's for serious matter) they may not be fully committed. Still, though, the purpose is that they must be spiritually bonded.
Interesting perspective. However, I would argue that nowadays, most people aren't spiritually bonded until they are married, and so long as their relationship can be broken up (I know divorce, but that's for serious matter) they may not be fully committed. Still, though, the purpose is that they must be spiritually bonded.
I disagree, because it is possible to be very interconnected with someone, even without marriage. And like Mr. I use caps and speak good said it isn't a sin, rather a personal preference.
