God created light on the 21stday. God created the sun on the 4th day. The sun was obviously not the first light. Maybe the 1st day light refers to the Big Bang.
I meant to say that God created light on the 1st day, not the 21st. Whoops.
God and Evolution don't get a long much
There's a lot of people who justify Theism and Evolutionism together. It's called Theistic Evolution, or Evolutionist Creationism. (I know, very creative names).
Why? Let's say God created the world to start in the middle of the timeline rather than the beginning. In this way, we would have, in the past, been evolved from a common ancestor. But at the point in the timeline, that was in a past that never happened. I know it's a little confusing, but it's not impossible.
How ever it is equally perposterous.
Evolution is pretty hard to argue against with all the evidence backing it. The Big Bang is a theory with less evidence. I don't think either are perposterous, but I suppose you could make the argument that the Big Bang is perposterous; maybe not so much evolution.
Also, why do ytou think everythi ng scientific is fabricated? You're being close-minded and paranoid. Just a moment, lemme find Firefly's link list to drop on you . . . .
Well, one, tons of independent scientists and others all over the world have come to the same conclusion about how things evolve and change over time. Two, common sense, things change. Three, it makes sense.
dont be a hater.. of course theres going to be error. theres error in everything, even scientoligy.
hahahaha... I'm sorry, just had to laugh at this, especially the Scientology part. Every single thing about Scientology is fantasy, because this "religion" came directly from a science-fiction novel created by an author that was on cocaine. Sadly enough, there are people that believe in it.
Perhaps you are mistaking this from Science? Of course there are flaws in Science, except we scientists take steps in fixing those problems. Religion keeps their texts as is, and leave it like that, 'cept for the Catholic Church.
They fear for their loss of their grip on their people, so when some scientific breakthrough unfolds, they are willing to change their own holy texts, "written by man, spoken to by God" in order to save their precious religion.
Why? Let's say God created the world to start in the middle of the timeline rather than the beginning. In this way, we would have, in the past, been evolved from a common ancestor. But at the point in the timeline, that was in a past that never happened. I know it's a little confusing, but it's not impossible.
Be prepared to correct me if I'm wrong, BigP08...I'm gonna try and take this piece by piece. Universe already existed, so all the fragments, stars, planets, dust, and Chuck Norris was already there. Then, God comes in and puts everything in the world.
... WELL OF COURSE THAT HAPPENED! XD The world was made several billion years ago, while the universe theoretically originated 3 times before that...
The Big Bang is a theory with less evidence. I don't think either are perposterous, but I suppose you could make the argument that the Big Bang is perposterous; maybe not so much evolution.
Big Bang = creation of universe. Evolution = continuous buildup and change of organisms over time. Big difference; biggest is : BB is a theory. Evolution will become a law.
Be prepared to correct me if I'm wrong, BigP08...I'm gonna try and take this piece by piece. Universe already existed, so all the fragments, stars, planets, dust, and Chuck Norris was already there. Then, God comes in and puts everything in the world.
Yeah, I'm having a difficult time explaining this. First (assuming God exists, obviously), nothing was there except God. Then God created the world in the middle of its timeline. Therefore, the past never existed, but had it existed, we would have had a common ancestor and, going back further, we'd have fragments, stars, planets, dust, and Chuck Norris. It begins in what we would define as the middle. For example, the first organism that reproduced sexually wasn't produced sexually, but studying its organic composition would show that other organism like it are produced sexually. It began at one point in the genetic timeline of that species, even though logically there would have to be a past to it. This is kind of tricky to explain, so strain yourself a little bit and reread it a couple times. I'm not saying that anything else existed before God created it (should he exist), but, once he created it, everything had a scientific history that would normally go along with it.
