well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
What evidence do you have backing it up? You have nothing
[url=http://nasascience.nasa.gov/astrophysics/what-powered-the-big-bang] it is a brief explanation of how the Big Bang theory came about
you believe in Big Bang? right?
well, I'm skeptical. I haven't really read a full in depth explanation of the big bang so I'm not completely sure what the theory is (although i still probably know more than most of these people).
which was made by a previous Big Bang. The continuous recycle of universes is an infinitesimal loop.
first off, this part of the theory is a complete guess. also it is an Infinite loop not an infinitesimal loop, that would make no sense. infinitesimal means infinitely small.
i know. that's because i don't really respect you. this isn't just because you are christian i have MANY christian friends but you are unintelligent.
Agoff, this is where you shut up and feel ashamed that you stooped so low. Debate can get heated, but the WEPR is intended to be polite. Even being able to last long enough in an argument to reduce you to shining and insulting means that he isn't an idiot.
And don't claim seniority in the forum on me, because you don't have it.
who made the smart man? ect.
His parents. And also, people are not machines - their intelligence is not entirely dependent on heredity. so your analogy is null and void.
(although i still probably know more than most of these people).
Don't be so superior. The WEPR is full of informed people, like (warning, self-praise coming up) Mage, Moegreche, Firefly, Freak, Kirby, and me.
Even being able to last long enough in an argument to reduce you to shining and insulting means that he isn't an idiot.
i admit that i got confused and thought he said some of the stuff cweb said (who is unarguably unintelligent), but he still isn't intelligent. you can tell if you look through some of his posts when he says things he has no idea about.
Don't be so superior. The WEPR is full of informed people, like (warning, self-praise coming up) Mage, Moegreche, Firefly, Freak, Kirby, and me.
First off i am much smarter than most of the people that i had arguments with especially on this subject and i said most because i know that there are people like you that are intelligent.
but he still isn't intelligent. you can tell if you look through some of his posts when he says things he has no idea about.
He's uninformed, but not necessarily unintelligent. He isn't a bad debater, he just doesn't have the facts with him. Seriously, bashing is not cool.
First off i am much smarter than most of the people that i had arguments with especially on this subject and i said most because i know that there are people like you that are intelligent.
Ohhh, I thought by 'here' you meant the WEPR, not this thread.
The WEPR is full of informed people, like (warning, self-praise coming up) Mage, Moegreche, Firefly, Freak, Kirby, and me.
Ouch! I feel a little insulted considering I spend most of me AG time in the WERP. I also made your awesome list... =( *goes off and cries in the bathroom*
I believe in God, someone who was just there
Weird. You can accept something that "just is" without proof, but can say sincerely say that you need a reason to explain what caused the Big Bang?
Ouch! I feel a little insulted considering I spend most of me AG time in the WERP. I also made your awesome list... =( *goes off and cries in the bathroom*
Oh, that was just the first part of the list. You're on it too. Right in between Lieu(*sniffle*) and TSL.
well, I'm skeptical. I haven't really read a full in depth explanation of the big bang so I'm not completely sure what the theory is (although i still probably know more than most of these people).
Your skeptical of the theory, but you don't know what the theory is. That is fascinating. I'm taking it that you believe the Big Bang Theory to be false. And yet, by your own admission, you have very little knowledge of the theory. This means your belief is unjustified and thus, irrational.
first off, this part of the theory is a complete guess. also it is an Infinite loop not an infinitesimal loop, that would make no sense. infinitesimal means infinitely small.
There is nothing in the scientific community that earns the title of "theory" while being nothing more than a blind guess. This is a complete strawman of this theory. And while the infinite series of universes theory has fallen out of favor, there was mathematical support for the theory. Really, there is a critical mass at which the universe will either continue to expand "the big freeze" or collapse back upon itself "the big crunch." While we can't we certain, the numbers are pointing more toward a forever expanding universe. I had a point here, but I can't remember. Maybe it was just that these theories are not guesses.
Your skeptical of the theory, but you don't know what the theory is. That is fascinating. I'm taking it that you believe the Big Bang Theory to be false. And yet, by your own admission, you have very little knowledge of the theory. This means your belief is unjustified and thus, irrational.
no. i know a lot about the theory, more than most people. i just am skeptical because i don't know the specific details very well
There is nothing in the scientific community that earns the title of "theory" while being nothing more than a blind guess. This is a complete strawman of this theory. And while the infinite series of universes theory has fallen out of favor, there was mathematical support for the theory. Really, there is a critical mass at which the universe will either continue to expand "the big freeze" or collapse back upon itself "the big crunch." While we can't we certain, the numbers are pointing more toward a forever expanding universe. I had a point here, but I can't remember. Maybe it was just that these theories are not guesses.
that is why it isnt really part of the theory. they just think it is reasonable to think this would happen but there is no evidence.
first off, this part of the theory is a complete guess.
Oh really? I think it makes a good deal of sense to me. You can continue building off something, but not if it doesn't have enough support. What does something do when it doesn't have a strong enough base? It collapses. The base in the universe's sense being gravity itself.
First off i am much smarter than most of the people that i had arguments with especially on this subject
You're not proving it by insulting those that have a comparing perspective on this subject. You know, there IS a difference between stupidity and ignorance.
I removed one where you called someone stupid or something like that. But comments like this are what our profiles are for.
Whyismynametom (did I get that right?), please don't spam. Especially if there is a mod hovering nearby (Moegreche). In order to fully contribute to this forum, please state WHY you believe in God/evolution, instead of a single opinion.
no. i know a lot about the theory, more than most people. i just am skeptical because i don't know the specific details very well
The specific details you mention that you are oblivious to are what gives certain individuals greater knowledge over this theory than others. How do you believe that you know more over the theory when you admit that you are unaware of the details?
