ForumsWEPRSatan

240 39191
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

The so called "Evil" antagonist of the Bible. The question comes to this: Why is he the evil one? He killed a mere ten people in the Bible, possibly more to around fifty at most, while God, the supposed good one, killed billions. The only "negative" thing he did was rebel against god, but it was a just rebel. Who would want to live under that tyrant?

So the question comes down to: Why do Christians think Satan is evil?

  • 240 Replies
Nurvana
offline
Nurvana
2,520 posts
Farmer

And the saddest thing of all of this is that you guys are wasting your childhood trying to do something that is impossible to do: Disprove God. You guys know it's true, yet here you are wasting time. Me? Hell these are free forum posts. And hey that might be why everyone else is here. But soon this may be quoted and yelled at, but hey try to disprove God. You can't. As for atheism? How did the earth start? Bring 1000 non believers into a room and they would strangle each other over the answer. Something or other about "singularity". Half right there. I'm really bored so I'm just rambling, but yeah free posts and a good laugh every day. Hurray.

Nurvana
offline
Nurvana
2,520 posts
Farmer

In one word, Goumas: Jealousy.

Avorne
offline
Avorne
3,085 posts
Nomad

Lets see....

He killed Lot's wife for looking back

Onan for 'spilling his seed' (If you know what I mean)

All the Egyption first born children

Some people who complained about the food

A man who picked up sticks on Shabbat

Samson+God kill a lot of people

Saul kills all the Amalekites.

Making a wall fall on Syrian soldiers

The children who made fun of Elisha's Bald head (God sent Bears to kill them)

The ethiopeans

Saul

That's all for now, there is probably more but they're all I could find with a quick look through my bible.

NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

And the saddest thing of all of this is that you guys are wasting your childhood trying to do something that is impossible to do: Disproving that I can transform into a dinosaur. You guys know it's true, yet here you are wasting time. Me? Hell these are free forum posts. And hey that might be why everyone else is here. But soon this may be quoted and yelled at, but hey try to disprove that I can transform into a dinosaur. You can't. As for atheism? How did dinosaurs exist in the first place? Bring 1000 non believers into a room and they would strangle each other over the answer. Something or other about "singularity". Half right there. I'm really bored so I'm just rambling, but yeah free posts and a good laugh every day. Hurray.

BTW, I powerspawned all dinosaurs through my nose. You are stupid to believe otherwise because you can't prove it didn't happen. Sure, you have lack of evidence, but everyone knows lack of evidence can't be used as evidence in itself to disprove something! Also, I used my awesome powers to kill Abe Lincoln. You can't disprove that I killed him using historical texts, because the historical texts are all wrong... all of them. Prove that I didn't kill Lincoln. Scientists and their notes on his body also don't count, because scientists don't have the common sense to understand creationism, so you know you can't trust them with anything else.

If you want to know what YOU sound like to an atheist, that's what you sound like.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

Oh yes why else were they killed?


For someone else doing something god does not like, for doing something that they think is fine but god does not like it (EX burning incense, complaining about food and being dragged threw the desert, giving a true scout report), being suspected as being a witch, being homosexual; a faithless; or king that god does not like, etc.


Yes they were all killing each other so...


So you are saying they should all die instead of going to a cosmic jail? Do I even have to state what is wrong with that?

There are most certainly differently different kinds of jealous. AS in God is jealous of our love, while the devil is jealous of God's power. Satan wasn't saving anyone. Who did he save?


If Satan won the revolution, then he would could easily have saved TRILLIONS by not killing them as god had, TRILLIONS more if he destroyed hell, and finally THE ENTIRE EARTH by stopping rapture.

Choose your own path: Just be nice and get everlasting life, or turn against him so he has no choice but to punish you. Just don't murder, steal, commit adultery, etc. It's not that hard to get into heaven and that's how God wants it.


Not so. It is nigh impossible for non-Christians to get in. If someone else commits one sin, one lie, one moment of lust, one second of work on Sabbath day, then they will go to hell as they won't repent.

You see though young one that an all powerful being makes all that possible. So if you don't believe in an all powerful God, then that is the only illogical part of the BIble. So thanks for wasting time.


Yes. Of course. There is nothing impossible about cockatrice, dragons, wizards, and everything else that we do not see in the modern world but were abundant in the Bible.

None of that makes any sense, but: An all loving God says, just be nice and you'll go to heaven. A guy murders and rapes his whole life and goes to hell. Who's fault is it?


A guy lies once to defend a ton of people, does not repent, and goes to hell. Who's fault is that?

A guy kills one man to save a lot of people, does not repent, and goes to hell. Who's fault is that?

A guy collects would on Sabbath day, does not have a chance to repent because they stoned him to death. He goes to hell. Who's fault is that?

Why put them in jail when they were going to die anyway and go to hell?


So they have a chance to live, restructure there lives, and so on. According to you we should hang people for shoplifting. Don't you think that is a little extremist?

Well he is so you can either stop dragging it out or embarrass yourself by trying to find otherwise.


You can try to prove it so, as it is not so. I can't prove that something is not there, and I am already trying on one thing. Maybe once people stop believing this god fella I will find you non-existent verse.

God has never done something wrong. Name one instance he has, and we, to our faith, will refute it. That you don't agree is not our fault. I find it hilarious that you are critiquing someone who you say you don't even think exists.


Human kills: Bad
God kills: Good
Human rapes: Bad
God rapes: Good
Human is jealous= Bad
God is jealous= Good

According to you whatever God does is right, even if a human does it it is wrong. Using that failed logic, then it is impossible for him to do something wrong. Using correct logic, then he is a tyrant.

And the saddest thing of all of this is that you guys are wasting your childhood trying to do something that is impossible to do: Disprove God. You guys know it's true, yet here you are wasting time. Me? Hell these are free forum posts. And hey that might be why everyone else is here. But soon this may be quoted and yelled at, but hey try to disprove God. You can't. As for atheism? How did the earth start? Bring 1000 non believers into a room and they would strangle each other over the answer. Something or other about "singularity". Half right there. I'm really bored so I'm just rambling, but yeah free posts and a good laugh every day. Hurray.


NoName got that fine, as it was just rambling and no real argument...
Avorne
offline
Avorne
3,085 posts
Nomad

How is it not logical for him not to exist?

As far as I can see it's more logical than him existing.

Gradient
offline
Gradient
36 posts
Nomad

Satan rebelled only by THOUGHT against God, saying something like "What if..." in his mind.

And he encouraged people to sin not to harm said people, but simply because he hates God and wants to make him angry.

Thus, making the Bible the first manga ever written.

wajor59
offline
wajor59
909 posts
Nomad

Isaiah 45:7,(NIV) says
I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things.

Isaiah 45:9,(NIV) says
Woe to him who quarrels with his Maker, to him who is but a potsherd among the potsherds on the ground. Does the clay say to the potter, "What are you making?" Does your work say, "He has no hands?"

Isaiah 45:10,(NIV) says
Woe to him who says to his father, "What have you begotten?" or to his mother, "What have you brought to birth?"

Isaiah 45:11,(NIV) says
"This is what the LORD says
the Holy One of Israel, and its Maker:
Concerning things to come, do you question me about my children, or give me orders about the works of my hands?

Isaiah 45:12,(NIV) says
It is I who made the earth and created mankind upon it.
My own hands stretched out the heavens;
I marshaled their starry hosts.

Now, what do scientist say, again about the Big Bang? That matter expanded? Hum, you see, I don't have a problem agreeing with scientists that hold to this theory.

Now, back to the OP, satan, was a fallen archangel of GOD, who considered himself to be more powerful than GOD. Satan and his demons, were cast out of heaven and he rules the earth for a limited time only. This same limited time is the time we're living in. Satan, with GOD's permission is allowed to "test" believers and some are tested more than others. The ones who are tested greatest and still Love the LORD, their GOD receive the greatest rewards,(crowns), in heaven. Believers don't receive their rewards on earth while they live because any reward on earth, stays on earth. There aren't any moving vans, Brinks trucks going to heaven.

Now, concerning GOD sending the "angel of death" to Egypt to kill all firstborn, or one way to say this is the second generation after Pharaoh, was a warning that Pharaoh ignored.

The bible says in Exodus 3:7 (...from the burning bush),GOD says to Moses, "I have indeed seen the misery of my people in Egypt. I have heard them crying out because of their slave drivers, and I am concerned about their suffering.
3:8 So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land into a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey
the home of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites Perizzites, Hivites,
and Jebusites.
3:9 And now the cry of the Israelites has reached me, and I have seen the way the Egyptians are oppressing them.
3:10 So now, go. I am sending you to Pharaoh to bring my people the Israelites out of Egypt.

So, you say GOD isn't just, patient, loving, omnipotent, omnipresent or omniscient?

God sends Moses time after time to ask Pharaoh to free the Israelites so they can go out to the desert for three days and worship their GOD until chapter 6 of Exodus.
Then the plagues start in chapter 7 and the firstborn of all people and cattle of Egypt are killed in chapters 11:1-12:33. The Israelites left Egypt at the end of 430 years of captivity, to the day.

MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

None of that makes any sense, but: An all loving God says, just be nice and you'll go to heaven. A guy murders and rapes his whole life and goes to hell. Who's fault is it?


But that's not all this "all loving God" says now is it? If you don't follow in line God punishes and the punishment is your fault. Just as it's the women's fault for walking down the ally and not the rapists. She chose to walk down the ally on her own free will so it was her fault.

Or perhaps the battered wife scenario.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXgnpuKoWhU
But of course it won't make sense to you because you are unable to place the blame where it belongs.

Well he is so you can either stop dragging it out or embarrass yourself by trying to find otherwise.


Well he is so that's that?... guess I can't argue with that logic... wow you really have me beat... what's next are yo going to tell me that your rubber and I'm glue?

God has never done something wrong. Name one instance he has, and we, to our faith, will refute it. That you don't agree is not our fault. I find it hilarious that you are critiquing someone who you say you don't even think exists.


demanding both animal and human sacrifices
mass murder
genocide (a number of times)
child murderer
could likely get him on animal abuse

It's not that you will refute it, it's that you'll make excuses for it.

You know what the fun thing is NoName? I can totally change that paragraph to my liking as well.


You know what's funny? I think you missed the point of that post.

"If you want to know what YOU sound like to an atheist, that's what you sound like. "
dacer
offline
dacer
2,820 posts
Nomad

Discussions on religion that involve debate, are pathetic.

if you try to debate about the devil existing, your retarded.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

Now, back to the OP, satan, was a fallen archangel of GOD, who considered himself to be more powerful than GOD. Satan and his demons, were cast out of heaven and he rules the earth for a limited time only. This same limited time is the time we're living in. Satan, with GOD's permission is allowed to "test" believers and some are tested more than others. The ones who are tested greatest and still Love the LORD, their GOD receive the greatest rewards,(crowns), in heaven. Believers don't receive their rewards on earth while they live because any reward on earth, stays on earth. There aren't any moving vans, Brinks trucks going to heaven.


Last I checked, we were not living under Satan and the only person he tested was Job. And an omnipotent god could not just move your rewards? And if he was given god's permission, then why is he considered evil?

Now, concerning GOD sending the "angel of death" to Egypt to kill all firstborn, or one way to say this is the second generation after Pharaoh, was a warning that Pharaoh ignored.


So you are saying that it is OK to murder innocents as long as it is for a warning? The first borns had done nothing wrong. They were only children of the people who pissed god off. He killed innocents EVEN THOUGH HE KNEW IT WOULD EFFECT NOTHING! If he was omniscient, he would have known that killing all the first borns would be pointless, yet he still did it...

A movie that kind of goes along with the topic.

So, you say GOD isn't just, patient, loving, omnipotent, omnipresent or omniscient?


He is not. In fact, Pharaoh would have let them go but god "hardened his heart" making it so he didn't. How is that all loving and patient?

God sends Moses time after time to ask Pharaoh to free the Israelites so they can go out to the desert for three days and worship their GOD until chapter 6 of Exodus.
Then the plagues start in chapter 7 and the firstborn of all people and cattle of Egypt are killed in chapters 11:1-12:33. The Israelites left Egypt at the end of 430 years of captivity, to the day.


They were there in the first place BECAUSE OF GOD sending a famine. It is just a chain of cruelty that ended with god's favorites being a little bit happier, costing many innocent lives, not only of the children and cattle but of the soldiers killed in the see and the thousands who died in the plagues.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Now, concerning GOD sending the "angel of death" to Egypt to kill all firstborn, or one way to say this is the second generation after Pharaoh, was a warning that Pharaoh ignored.


Oh well that makes it the Pharaohs fault for God killing because you know an omnipotent being had no other choice but to kill in order to free some slaves from a mortal ruler. It's not like God could have found a non violent means of freeing everyone with his omnipotence.

So, you say GOD isn't just, patient, loving, omnipotent, omnipresent or omniscient?


As I was sarcastically getting at above using threats and death is in direct conflict with being these things.
wajor59
offline
wajor59
909 posts
Nomad

Last I checked, we were not living under Satan and the only person he tested was Job. And an omnipotent god could not just move your rewards? And if he was given god's permission, then why is he considered evil?


Good questions, finally 314d1, I consider these to be legitimate questions and not plain arguments, it'll be a pleasure to answer them, as best I can.

Paul, Jesus, James, and others in the New Testament warn of satans cunning in luring the hearts and minds of believers by causing us to:
* doubt the existence of GOD, Jesus and the Holy Spirit
* doubt our salvation/redemption,(I get to redemption a little later)
* lose faith in the authority of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit
and in many other, subtle ways, slowly over a period of time.

The streets will be paved with purist gold, the walls of heaven will be layered with precious gems and the gates will be of solid pearl. Our rewards, money, jewelry, stuff is all going to rot, rust and be stolen away when our earthly bodies "give up the ghost". We won't need that stuff/junk any more, we won't even miss it.
Job's story tells us that God doesn't need a reason to send satan to test us and to know God is much more important than to know all of the answers to our questions. This may seem as if I'm avoiding the question but the main goal is to know and trust God no matter what happens to us, our family, our possessions.

Satan is considered evil because he thinks he is smarter, better looking, and more powerful than the one who created him. That's the lesson we get from the potsherd story.


So you are saying that it is OK to murder innocents as long as it is for a warning? The first borns had done nothing wrong. They were only children of the people who pissed god off. He killed innocents EVEN THOUGH HE KNEW IT WOULD EFFECT NOTHING! If he was omniscient, he would have known that killing all the first borns would be pointless, yet he still did it...


The problem everyone has with these questions is that we place GOD on a human level, he is spirit. He sent his son, in the form of a human to redeem Gods chosen children both Jew and Greek.
What's the big deal with the word redeem/redemption?
The story of Exodus and the Passover when the Israelites were &quotassed over" by the angel of death and their firstborn were spared, there was a price. That price was blood. The Israelites had to "buy back" their children that were spared with blood sacrifices. Redeem means to buy back.

It's extremely hard for us, in this century to wrap our minds around all of this blood. We don't think like this any more and we don't act like this any more. God doesn't require us to take first born lambs, calves, birds, grain, etc to the priest every time we sin, anymore. Jesus replaced the blood requirement and redeemed us all, once and for all.

He is not. In fact, Pharaoh would have let them go but god "hardened his heart" making it so he didn't. How is that all loving and patient?


From Exodus 10:1-2,
God hardened the hearts of Pharaoh and his officials so that God's miraculous signs would be allowed among them(Egyptians) and so the Israelites would tell their children and grandchildren that God deals harshly with the Egyptians and how God performs these miracles so that the Israelites would know he is God.

Exodus 11:1 God tells Moses about the last plague and that "Pharaoh will let you go from here, and when he does, he will drive you out completely."

Exodus 11:2 tells of the instructions for the Israelites "to ask the Egyptians for silver and gold."

Exodus 11:3 explains that "God made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the Israelites and Moses was highly regarded in Egypt by Pharaoh's officials and people."

Exodus 11:6-8 describes the crying throughout Egypt after the firstborn all die..."worse than there has ever been or ever will be again." Contrasting the silence amongst the Israelites even the dogs won't bark. [b]Then you will know that the Lord makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel. Moses continues warning Pharaoh of every aspect of what is to come and in closing says,"All these officials of yours will come to me, bowing down before me and saying, 'Go, you and all the people that follow you!' After that I will leave. Then Moses, hot with anger, left Pharaoh."


[i]They were there in the first place BECAUSE OF GOD sending a famine. It is just a chain of cruelty that ended with god's favorites being a little bit happier, costing many innocent lives, not only of the children and cattle but of the soldiers killed in the see and the thousands who died in the plagues.



That's your opinion.


Oh well that makes it the Pharaohs fault for God killing because you know an omnipotent being had no other choice but to kill in order to free some slaves from a mortal ruler. It's not like God could have found a non violent means of freeing everyone with his omnipotence.


Of course God could have but that wasn't going to redeem his chosen people.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

The problem everyone has with these questions is that we place GOD on a human level, he is spirit.


No that's not the problem. The problem is this God is suppose to be far better then us and that just does not show.

He sent his son, in the form of a human to redeem Gods chosen children both Jew and Greek.
What's the big deal with the word redeem/redemption?


God had to have a human sacrifice in order to say your forgiven? This story doesn't illustrate how good God is but just how sick he is. It doesn't matter if it was his son or not. Thinking about it, it make it worse being his son.

The story of Exodus and the Passover when the Israelites were &quotassed over" by the angel of death and their firstborn were spared, there was a price. That price was blood. The Israelites had to "buy back" their children that were spared with blood sacrifices. Redeem means to buy back.


A price God set. This is exactly what I mean about the consequences come from God's hand rather then the choice.

It's extremely hard for us, in this century to wrap our minds around all of this blood. We don't think like this any more and we don't act like this any more. God doesn't require us to take first born lambs, calves, birds, grain, etc to the priest every time we sin, anymore. Jesus replaced the blood requirement and redeemed us all, once and for all.


Yeah we advanced beyond such barbarism. Why was God into such barbarism in the first place? The requirement of blood at all weather it be animal sacrifice or human sacrifice is what makes God blood thirsty.

Requiring blood is not the action of an all loving, all powerful being. However I would expect it to be the action of a blood thirsty tyrant.

Of course God could have but that wasn't going to redeem his chosen people.


Nice excuse, sounds a bit like the battered house wife again.
"Yeah I could have chosen not to hit her but if I didn't she wouldn't learn her lesson."

Time to stop getting fists in the face and calling them doorknobs.
BlackIce131
offline
BlackIce131
260 posts
Nomad

Discussions on religion that involve debate, are pathetic.

if you try to debate about the devil existing, your retarded.

I tried this argument dacer, it doesn't work.


I just try not to get involved with anything pro or against religion in public areas, which i have just failed at by posting this comment.

Really though i think if someone is religious or non religious, keeping it too themselves and in their house or areas menant for it is the only way to get any good out of either.
Last thing you want to do is get into a flame war.
Showing 31-45 of 240