Last I checked, we were not living under Satan and the only person he tested was Job. And an omnipotent god could not just move your rewards? And if he was given god's permission, then why is he considered evil?
Good questions, finally 314d1, I consider these to be legitimate questions and not plain arguments, it'll be a pleasure to answer them, as best I can.
Paul, Jesus, James, and others in the New Testament warn of satans cunning in luring the hearts and minds of believers by causing us to:
* doubt the existence of GOD, Jesus and the Holy Spirit
* doubt our salvation/redemption,(I get to redemption a little later)
* lose faith in the authority of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit
and in many other, subtle ways, slowly over a period of time.
The streets will be paved with purist gold, the walls of heaven will be layered with precious gems and the gates will be of solid pearl. Our rewards, money, jewelry, stuff is all going to rot, rust and be stolen away when our earthly bodies "give up the ghost". We won't need that stuff/junk any more, we won't even miss it.
Job's story tells us that God doesn't need a reason to send satan to test us and to know God is much more important than to know all of the answers to our questions. This may seem as if I'm avoiding the question but the main goal is to know and trust God no matter what happens to us, our family, our possessions.
Satan is considered evil because he thinks he is smarter, better looking, and more powerful than the one who created him. That's the lesson we get from the potsherd story.
So you are saying that it is OK to murder innocents as long as it is for a warning? The first borns had done nothing wrong. They were only children of the people who pissed god off. He killed innocents EVEN THOUGH HE KNEW IT WOULD EFFECT NOTHING! If he was omniscient, he would have known that killing all the first borns would be pointless, yet he still did it...
The problem everyone has with these questions is that we place GOD on a human level, he is spirit. He sent his son, in the form of a human to
redeem Gods chosen children both Jew and Greek.
What's the big deal with the word redeem/redemption?
The story of Exodus and the Passover when the Israelites were "
assed over" by the angel of death and their firstborn were spared, there was a price. That price was blood. The Israelites had to "buy back" their children that were spared with blood sacrifices. Redeem means to buy back.
It's extremely hard for us, in this century to wrap our minds around all of this blood. We don't think like this any more and we don't act like this any more. God doesn't require us to take first born lambs, calves, birds, grain, etc to the priest every time we sin, anymore. Jesus replaced the blood requirement and
redeemed us all, once and for all.
He is not. In fact, Pharaoh would have let them go but god "hardened his heart" making it so he didn't. How is that all loving and patient?
From Exodus 10:1-2,
God hardened the hearts of Pharaoh and his officials so that God's miraculous signs would be
allowed among them(Egyptians) and so the Israelites would tell their children and grandchildren that God deals harshly with the Egyptians and
how God performs these miracles so that the Israelites would know he is God.
Exodus 11:1 God tells Moses about the last plague and that "Pharaoh will let you go from here, and when he does, he will drive you out completely."
Exodus 11:2 tells of the instructions for the Israelites "to ask the Egyptians for silver and gold."
Exodus 11:3 explains that "God made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the Israelites and Moses was highly regarded in Egypt by Pharaoh's officials and people."
Exodus 11:6-8 describes the crying throughout Egypt after the firstborn all die..."worse than there has ever been or ever will be again." Contrasting the silence amongst the Israelites even the dogs won't bark.
[b]Then you will know that the Lord makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel. Moses continues warning Pharaoh of every aspect of what is to come and in closing says,"All these officials of yours will come to me, bowing down before me and saying, 'Go, you and all the people that follow you!' After that I will leave. Then Moses, hot with anger, left Pharaoh."
[i]They were there in the first place BECAUSE OF GOD sending a famine. It is just a chain of cruelty that ended with god's favorites being a little bit happier, costing many innocent lives, not only of the children and cattle but of the soldiers killed in the see and the thousands who died in the plagues.
That's your opinion.
Oh well that makes it the Pharaohs fault for God killing because you know an omnipotent being had no other choice but to kill in order to free some slaves from a mortal ruler. It's not like God could have found a non violent means of freeing everyone with his omnipotence.
Of course God could have but that wasn't going to redeem his chosen people.