I am going to a trip soon and this just came to mind. What are your toughts on this high security in the airports? there has been many things going on with not allowing people on the plane because of their religion and things like that. any thoughts?
I'm sure we can make one. But when you think about it the odds of it happening are so small, however when it does hijaking can be a tragity.
How, exactly? The only thing in common all explosives have is the fact they are explosive, and that is typically something you don't want to check it for.
What does that have to do with anything? I am sure that highjacking would be an ineffective way to find explosives, not to mention the fact that people would be annoyed with planes being constantly hijacked...
not to mention the fact that people would be annoyed with planes being constantly hijacked...
Lol.
*Today yet another plane was Hi-jacked, but since there were no injuries (aside from the hi-jackers, who were both shot and killed) it was deemed acceptable by the populace yet again, except for a growing number of people voicing their request to have people scanned before boarding the plane to prevent these situations*
I am going to a trip soon and this just came to mind. What are your toughts on this high security in the airports? there has been many things going on with not allowing people on the plane because of their religion and things like that. any thoughts?
I've always felt this was somewhat illogical. If a terrorist wanted to cause some real damage they'd blow up the airport. Why not make it harder to get into an airport instead of on the airplane?
What does that have to do with anything? I am sure that highjacking would be an ineffective way to find explosives, not to mention the fact that people would be annoyed with planes being constantly hijacked...
What? I was just talking about hijaking in general, not using hijackers to track bombs.
I've always felt this was somewhat illogical. If a terrorist wanted to cause some real damage they'd blow up the airport. Why not make it harder to get into an airport instead of on the airplane?
Hmm that really would be smarter, but the bomb would have to be big to blow up a good portion and start a fire. Airports can be pretty huge.
Hmm that really would be smarter, but the bomb would have to be big to blow up a good portion and start a fire. Airports can be pretty huge.
Shush!!! Obviously this is so, but we let the crazies take the less effective route to vent their craziness! Don't give them IDEAZ!
Hmm that really would be smarter, but the bomb would have to be big to blow up a good portion and start a fire. Airports can be pretty huge.
Not really, you could just take out key structural points and put the whole airport out of commision for months while they do repairs, however, i'd think it unlikely that they'd be able to completely bring the airport down.
This topic sounds like it was made by Jerry Seinfeld.
That was sort of the point it is called an attention grabber and this title works in two way
1. a person goes hey thats funny wonder what it is about 2. a troll comes sees the title and says "totally going to comment and say 'dude stop spamming forum'" then they see it is an actual topic and are interested
when you have a religious faction that wants to do this as much as possible, it kinda makes you suspicious to see anyone of the main ethnicity of that religion...
I've always felt this was somewhat illogical. If a terrorist wanted to cause some real damage they'd blow up the airport. Why not make it harder to get into an airport instead of on the airplane?
It's hard to get into the sensitive areas of airports. The rest of the airport is the same as any other public place.
I just think that the federal security should find an effective system so, that when they make an accusation iis a reasonable one. not to just jump and interrogate and 11 year old kid going to Jamaica because he brought a whole bunch of lolipops! (true story a kid I knew was interrogated for this reason)
