Hi. This topic is about the so-called "Big Bang", aka the explosion that created the universe.
What do you think about it?
I'm undecided. I don't know what is the most correct: Isn't logical to think that a big "KABOOM" created the universe and all it's features, but I really don't have a clear opinion about it...
Here you go - have some evidence for the Big Bang. Also, in the Christianity FTW thread, Dair5 gave a rather concise but quite-detailed account of what exactly the Big Bang Theory states - I'll copy that here so we all have at least a basic understanding of what we're talking about and to eliminate some misconceptions:
The big bang theory states that at the beginning there was a extrememly condensed point of energy. This point expands and as the universe cools down some matter are made from the energy. We start off with small matter like hydrogen. Then the hydrogen clump together and become stars. Stars then explode over time and make heavier elements due to the immense power and energy. we then have more rocky elements and that means we have astorids which colide and create planets.
I'm not certain whether the Big Bang theory in it's entirety and in its current form is entirely accurate but I'd say that we're certainly along the right lines of understanding.
I believe in the Big Bang 2. The reason Big Bang happened, to my opinion, is God, and no other. Becuase there is no other reason to explain the Big Bang, right?
The big bang theory states that at the beginning there was a extrememly condensed point of energy. This point expands and as the universe cools down some matter are made from the energy. We start off with small matter like hydrogen. Then the hydrogen clump together and become stars. Stars then explode over time and make heavier elements due to the immense power and energy. we then have more rocky elements and that means we have astorids which colide and create planets. THE END. haven't I done this before?
This stands in opposition to what you claimed ("This topic is about the so-called "Big Bang", aka the explosion that created the universe."); the Big Bang was not an explosion.
"In the Big Bang theory, the universe begins as very hot, small and dense, with no stars, atoms, form, or structure (called a "singularity". Then about 14 billion years ago. The space in the universe expanded very very quickly (like a big bang), and later atoms formed, and then the stars and their galaxies. The universe is still expanding today, and getting bigger, but colder." Wiki
The basic knowledge of everybody about Big Bang is recognizing it as a huge KABOOM!
And when you over-simplify it like that you prove just how little you know about it.
Anyway, my theory is that Big Bang and God are related.
] Which God? Why God? How? When? Why do you even need to add an extraneous element like God into the Big Bang? Or are you just trying to cram God into the gaps?
Creating the Universe piece by piece would be very time-consuming, even for Him.
A supposedly all-knowing and all-powerful perfect being isn't able to just poof everything into existence? this being gets tired too? Doesn't sound so powerful or perfect to me.
Stop shoving God into holes where it doesn't belong.
I ain't no scientist. I just created this topic because I thought that would be a great topic, as active discussions would happen often. Is a thing that people like to discuss about.
I ain't shoving God into holes. My theory is a little too complicated to explain. Both are, anyway. Spanding matter could create life and humanity? Who knows?
I am taking it easy - I just want you to back up the things you're saying with at least some sort of proof.
I ain't shoving God into holes. My theory is a little too complicated to explain.
If you can't explain it then don't talk about it - otherwise it just looks like you're shoving God into holes.
Spanding matter could create life and humanity? Who knows?
Well, consider the brief explanation of the Big Bang that I quoted earlier, add into that the theory of Abiogenesis and you have the first signs of life - Evolution takes it from there and humanity pops out at some point.
Why science and religion don't stick together and find an aswer to the world's most important question?: Where we came from?
Science is based on proof, evidence and learning more about things through testing and observation whereas religion is purely based upon faith and faith alone which has no evidence or support. Science constantly looks for answers whereas religion just stagnates and repeats the same answer over and over.
I already said: I ain't no scientist. This is a basic explanation to a theory that my mind think is plausible.
Well, consider the brief explanation of the Big Bang that I quoted earlier, add into that the theory of Abiogenesis and you have the first signs of life - Evolution takes it from there and humanity pops out at some point.
Evolution? Monkeys turning onto humans? I don't think that the science from evolution is totally explained. I ain't seeing it from a religious way, but more research and answers would do the trick.
I will research what is Ambiogenesis...
Science is based on proof, evidence and learning more about things through testing and observation whereas religion is purely based upon faith and faith alone which has no evidence or support. Science constantly looks for answers whereas religion just stagnates and repeats the same answer over and over.
I guess that newer, 21st century scientists are too lazy. Proof and evidence does not look true and research is minimal. If science want to show its theories, it need more researching.
Evolution? Monkeys turning onto humans? I don't think that the science from evolution is totally explained. I ain't seeing it from a religious way, but more research and answers would do the trick.
The last part of your post is just stupid and the material I've linked you to is only a fraction of the research done without the last few decades into Evolution - it appears to me that you're the one too lazy to find out what you're talking about.
You don't have to be a scientist to learn. Research and data doesn't have to be from the 21st century to be evidence. The only difference is that newer additions add more shape to the already established theories. But it's not like any major jumps were created between themselves.
