ForumsWEPRWhy iran must not have nukes?

204 45896
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Title says it all.

  • 204 Replies
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

What about the ones Russia didn't keep track of? They can't even account for how many they've lost due to poor recordkeeping.


Technically the USSR broke up hence the loss of nukes. Russia is but one of the fifteen ex-Soviet republics so we can't blame just Russia.
Epolonte
offline
Epolonte
15 posts
Treasurer

I don't wanna offend anyone but..
The one that must not have nukes is USA.

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

The one that must not have nukes is USA.


Would you care to explain your reasoning please? It's a bit beside the point anyways, as the United States were the first ones to have them and still have them.
Epolonte
offline
Epolonte
15 posts
Treasurer

as the United States were the first ones to have them and still have them.


that's is part of the reason...USA with military forces made Latin America pass trough a dark age of military governments, political persecution, civilian massacres, etc. and don't forget about the world war,vietnam and middle east( don't about terrorism beacuse it is a lie).

BTW im from Argentina.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Now in Iran's case, we have stated earlier and given enough evidence to show that Iran wants to wipe out Israel and indirectly the USA. It has a stated end and purpose for launching nukes. It does so by funding terrorists groups, and will stoop to any means to do so

care to give a source where ahmedi niyad clearly says any thing about nuking usa or israel?
EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

care to give a source where ahmedi niyad clearly says any thing about nuking usa or israel?


He dosen't say nukes specifically, but...

Translation of his "World Without Zionism" speech: Unfortunately, the Islamic world has been withdrawing in the past 300 years. I do not want to examine the reasons for this, but only to review the history. The Islamic world lost its last defenses in the past 100 years and the world oppressor [United States] established the occupying regime [Israel]. Therefore the struggle in Palestine today is the major front of the struggle of the Islamic world with the world oppressor and its fate will decide the destiny of the struggles of the past several hundred years... Many who are disappointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels have tried to spread the blame. They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan.
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

care to give a source where ahmedi niyad clearly says any thing about nuking usa or israel?


First, learn to spell his name.

Secondly, he has mentioned that using any means possible to wipe out the infidel (Israel and the USA) is part of their agenda.

Specifically there was one line in an interview he gave on Al-Alam (Iran's Arabic channel).

''This country (â&brvbar will do anything to destroy the state of Israel.''


More quotes from him here.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

First, learn to spell his name.

Secondly, he has mentioned that using any means possible to wipe out the infidel (Israel and the USA) is part of their agenda.

Specifically there was one line in an interview he gave on Al-Alam (Iran's Arabic channel).

''This country (â�Â&brvbar will do anything to destroy the state of Israel.''

More quotes from him here.

same goes for us senator
still did he clearly says anything about nuking?`no, he does not cuz he is not stupid.
PS:- His name's pronounciation in ahmedi niyad not nijad
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

ahmedi niyad not nijad


You mentioned it yourself. Pronounced. My name is pronounced Fei-bian, but it's spelt Fabian.

still did he clearly says anything about nuking?`no, he does not cuz he is not stupid.


Tancredo is not in any position to launch nukes, given he isn't even a Senator. The Iranian President on the other hand is, and presents a much more direct and realistic threat.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

u still didnt answerd my question

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

u still didnt answerd my question


It was implied in my answer. Yes, he did advocate nuking Muslim Holy Sites. So? Look at my previous post. Derp.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Translation of his "World Without Zionism" speech: Unfortunately, the Islamic world has been withdrawing in the past 300 years. I do not want to examine the reasons for this, but only to review the history. The Islamic world lost its last defenses in the past 100 years and the world oppressor [United States] established the occupying regime [Israel]. Therefore the struggle in Palestine today is the major front of the struggle of the Islamic world with the world oppressor and its fate will decide the destiny of the struggles of the past several hundred years... Many who are disappointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels have tried to spread the blame. They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan.

where does he say destroy usa?
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

where does he say destroy usa?


Read his previous post. The implications are in bold.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible

u meant that
well, he is right world can exist without USA and zionism
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan.


Not, "a possible" you left out the last 3 words, "Goal and slogan" In other words, people SHOULD get rid of the united states.
Showing 151-165 of 204