You basically accused the taliban for ruining the country. Which is not true. They came and made peace by defeating the warlords
That is a rather unique way of looking at the history of the Taliban. The last thing they've been interested in since they began their campaign of ethnic cleansing in Afghanistan is peace.
They've been responsible for 15 massacres, silencing the Shia and Hazara communities through a combination of fear tactics (such as skinning individuals to make an example of them) and executing thousands of civilians.
As I said before. The taliban had strict rules and ideology, but it doesnt change the fact that the warlords were alot worse. And they were fighting amongst each other.
1. it off topic 2. In fact some places is actually beautiful
Quite right, parts of Afghanistan are very beautiful.
Yes I agree we have gone off topic, but it is only whilst trying to understand you my friend.
Well I am leaving now, I did not come here to be educated and I assure you that nobody on this website will change my opinions. I simply wanted to put my view across as I felt my experience may be valuable to this thread.
As for you DSM, you are a naive individual who lies about where he has been, obvious as you only wanted to stop argueing and go back to topic when I challenged you about visiting Afghan; and it seems you also support the Taliban, to that end I do not want to enquire any further about you, because that is all I need to know, to make a good guess of what kind of person you are.
As for you DSM, you are a naive individual who lies about where he has been, obvious as you only wanted to stop argueing and go back to topic when I challenged you about visiting Afghan; and it seems you also support the Taliban, to that end I do not want to enquire any further about you, because that is all I need to know, to make a good guess of what kind of person you are.
1 Stop accuse somebody for lying if you dont know them. And for the second I dont support taliban. I just stating the facts. 3 And what kind of person do you think I am?
I think that everything that is happening overthere is unfortunate and violent.Ihope that everything will go back to normal for all those people in the middle east.
And for the second I dont support taliban. I just stating the facts.
Not really, you're adapting a limited knowledge of the history of Afghanistan to suit your argument. That isn't stating facts, that is at best stretching the truth - at worst, lying.
The Taliban didn't defeat the 'warlords' and they haven't brought peace to Afghanistan. In fact some of the worst of the current power struggles took place when the Taliban arrived in 1994 to when the US forces arrived in 2001. But don't let the facts get in the way of a good yarn.
The Taliban and their allies committed massacres against Afghan civilians, denied UN food supplies to 160,000 starving civilians and conducted a policy of scorched earth burning vast areas of fertile land and destroying tens of thousands of homes during their rule from 1996-2001.
Which is the exact opposite of your statement:
You basically accused the taliban for ruining the country. Which is not true. They came and made peace by defeating the warlords
Your own link doesn't support your version of events which means that you are adapting the history to suit your own argument.
Due to the sudden initiation of the war, working government departments, police units or a system of justice and accountability for the newly-created Islamic State of Afghanistan did not have time to form. Horrific crimes were committed by individuals of different factions. Rare ceasefires, usually negotiated by representatives of Ahmad Shah Massoud, Sibghatullah Mojaddedi or Burhanuddin Rabbani (the interim government), or officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), commonly collapsed within days.[37]
Due to the sudden initiation of the war, working government departments, police units or a system of justice and accountability for the newly-created Islamic State of Afghanistan did not have time to form. Horrific crimes were committed by individuals of different factions. Rare ceasefires, usually negotiated by representatives of Ahmad Shah Massoud, Sibghatullah Mojaddedi or Burhanuddin Rabbani (the interim government), or officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), commonly collapsed within days.[37]
And how exactly does that support your argument that the Taliban didn't make things worse and they brought peace?
You've picked a random paragraph and highlighted a sentence that bears no relevance to what we're discussing. Is there a purpose or explanation?
How doesnt it have a relevance. I said they came and didnt make it to the worse. Brought peace, because the warlords was fighting amongst themselves. Which it clearly saids in the highlighting:
Horrific crimes were committed by individuals of different factions.
How doesnt it have a relevance. I said they came and didnt make it to the worse. Brought peace, because the warlords was fighting amongst themselves. Which it clearly saids in the highlighting:
No, what it clearly says is nothing more than horrific crimes were committed by individuals of different factions.
The Taliban are one of those factions incidently.
It says nothing about bringing peace at all. The word peace isn't mentioned at all in relation to the Taliban. In fact, in the part of the article you actually read, peace was mentioned once:
After the fall of the communist Mohammad Najibullah-regime in 1992, several Afghan political parties agreed on a peace and power-sharing agreement (the Peshawar Accords). The Peshawar Accords created the Islamic State of Afghanistan and appointed an interim government for a transitional period. According to Human Rights Watch:
Notice that the agreement was 1992. The Taliban didn't arrive until 1994.
So again, you're adapting the history to suit your own argument. The Taliban didn't bring peace and they didn't defeat the warlords.
You can continue to argue that despite not having a single shred of evidence, even in your own link, you're right because you say you're right. Or you can admit you were mistaken. There is nothing wrong with admitting you were mistaken, it is easy to do, especially if you skim read which most of us do if we're honest.
