The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
1486 | 258254 |
im just opening this topic so that people can have a NICE, FREINDLY place to talk about their beliefs, i Myself believe in evolutionism
ev·o·lu·tion·ism (ev'?-loo'sh?-niz'?m,)
n.
1.
A theory of biological evolution, especially that formulated by Charles Darwin.
2.
Advocacy of or belief in biological evolution.
It was a correct term, but it has long since become a way to make evolution seem like a religion and has nothing to do with accepting evolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionism
The greatest ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about
I'm a theistic evolutionist; way to know what you're debating against.
Do I need to remind you for a third time that I was joking?
I'm a theistic evolutionist; way to know what you're debating against.
Do I need to remind you for a third time that I was joking?
It was a correct term, but it has long since become a way to make evolution seem like a religion and has nothing to do with accepting evolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionism
http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/evolutionism.htm
Notice how their explanation of evolutionism is not what evolution is.
http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro21.html
Also not evolution.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolutionism
Says the same as wikipedia.
http://www.raptureready.com/rr-ec-debate.html
Creationist author.
http://creationwiki.org/Evolutionism
Creationist author showing no knowledge of evolution, or the science behind it.
http://www.trueorigin.org/steiger.asp
"the debate between proponents of evolutionism and creation scientists", You still think its a correct term?
Nothing will shake my belief that god was ultimately responsible
The law of biogenisis states that no life can come from non-life. Evolution requires this. Spontaneous generation has never been observed.
Natural selection only gets rid of harmful characteristics, it does not make new ones. Diversity is actually lost. No better material is coming in, so no new species can come out.
"Rarely, if ever, is a mutation beneficial to an organism in its natural environment. Almost all observable mutations are harmful: some are meaningless, many are lethal."
Seriously show me ANY evidence for macro-evolution as this debate is going no where you say it's true I say it's not so prove it now!
So evolution explains how the earth began?
How the earth began? The big bang? How all the matter got there? It has just always been there?
It has everything to do with the fact that abiogeneis is impossible due to the probability of it occurring.
So now your going to tell me that microevolution leads up to macroevolution; microevolution has nothing to do with changes in species and therefore they are completely different.
The last, oh three pages or so I've been testing your ability to have any sort of a debate with someone who believes in Creationism as this is the point of the thread. You failed; bad.
I think we need a new Evolution vs. Creationism thread. This one has not only been derailed completely but has an error in the title.
Advocacy of or belief in biological evolution.
As far as I remember, you pointed out a long time ago that Wiki isn't used as a source in debates on AG. So for definitions you of all people should be consulting the dictionary. Which is how evolutionism is being used in this debate, as "Advocacy of or belief in biological evolution."
overwhelming majority of scientists accept evolution
We were created to evolve.
The lesson from that story is that no matter how much evidence is thrown at you evolutionists, you aren't going to admit that Creation is the only logical answer. Evolutionism is a stupid theory that was created as a way to ignore God, the Bible, and the truth.
Hey don't respond to NoobsforDummies. No one can really be this close-minded and stupid.
He's obviously just attempting to Troll us.
And if he is really that dumb, don't try to have a conversation with him
@Mav - That's really mean. You shouldn't call people trolls or dumb just because they don't agree with you. It's a really good analogy. But it's missing one thing.
The doctor goes, "See you're bleeding, and you said dead men don't bleed." So the patient goes, "How closed-minded and stupid of you! I'm odviously not coming here no more cause your just trying to upset a dead man! Good bye!"
Hey don't respond to NoobsforDummies. No one can really be this close-minded and stupid.
He's obviously just attempting to Troll us.
And if he is really that dumb, don't try to have a conversation with him
Thread is locked!