ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78026 42819011
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 48 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

47. 100! - April 4, '23 at 12:25, 9 users, over 29 days.
TheMostManlyMan (1)[11], saint_of_gaming [2], Widestsinger [2], SirLegendary (2)[19], nichodemus (2)[6], danwar123, sciller45 (3)[14], HalRazor [2], disastermaster30 (3)[4]

48. 100! - July 20, '23 at 06:11, 15 users, 52 days.
saint_of_gaming [3], TheMostManlyMan (1)[12], Solas128, Widestsinger [3], sciller45 (4)[15], ScoobySnax, nichodemus (2)[7], SirLegendary (2)[20], GhostOfMatrix [3], Yellowcat (1)[10], portarto, HalRazor [3], jimmycarlos [2], IllustriousIllusion, robsob20061017 [2]

  • 78,026 Replies
saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
474 posts
Peasant

6. I honestly think I posted without seeing meaosome's post; in a month or so, the timestamp will tell us.

Solas128
offline
Solas128
85 posts
Peasant

7. How did you guys reset the count?

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
225 posts
Peasant

8. saint of gaming said 29 after someone else also said 29 but these forums are broke. It was only a 29 count so its not a big deal.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
301 posts
Prince

9. It's not the forum's fault(kinda). He just got ninjaed. If someone writes something in the page after you have opened it then you won't see it unless you refresh or submit.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
301 posts
Prince

1. Lol widestinger, you should have know better by now.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
474 posts
Peasant

2. I'm curious to see if its the exact same time stamp though. Oh well, here we go again.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
225 posts
Peasant

3. Oh it was an edit. Well I edited my message because I tried to @saint of gaming but it would only put @saint so I edited my message to if I could fix it but I couldn't figured That you cant @ someone with a space in there name. At least the count was only 9.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
474 posts
Peasant

4. My name has an underscore in it. Typing @saint_of_gaming works fine for me.

Solas128
offline
Solas128
85 posts
Peasant

5. This will never end.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
474 posts
Peasant

6. You have to keep believing we'll get there eventually.

Solas128
offline
Solas128
85 posts
Peasant

7. Ok I Believe I can fly!

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
301 posts
Prince

1. I have seen cats with a better learning ability than you

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
225 posts
Peasant

2. Ok you're not wrong but you don't have to be mean

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
301 posts
Prince

3. I don't care about kindness to people who don't even make an attempt to think.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
474 posts
Peasant

4. For all you know maybe he has some sort of severe psychiatric damage that we don't understand (I have moderate psychiatric damage myself but not to where I can't function fortunately); in which case it was my fault for giving @Solas128 the opportunity to do "4-hit tennis" yet again. If this is the case, we can POLITELY ask @Solas128 to not participate further until he has a basic understanding of the rules.

Showing 76216-76230 of 78026

We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing analytics and serving ads.
Learn More