ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78070 43841422
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 48 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

47. 100! - April 4, '23 at 12:25, 9 users, over 29 days.
TheMostManlyMan (1)[11], saint_of_gaming [2], Widestsinger [2], SirLegendary (2)[19], nichodemus (2)[6], danwar123, sciller45 (3)[14], HalRazor [2], disastermaster30 (3)[4]

48. 100! - July 20, '23 at 06:11, 15 users, 52 days.
saint_of_gaming [3], TheMostManlyMan (1)[12], Solas128, Widestsinger [3], sciller45 (4)[15], ScoobySnax, nichodemus (2)[7], SirLegendary (2)[20], GhostOfMatrix [3], Yellowcat (1)[10], portarto, HalRazor [3], jimmycarlos [2], IllustriousIllusion, robsob20061017 [2]

  • 78,070 Replies
meaosome
offline
meaosome
155 posts
Scribe

5. C'mon guys, don't take the fun out of the count. After all, it isn't too big of a deal if we lose.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
486 posts
Peasant

6. I'm happy to be not hardcore about the count (notice I said "can" I'm just sick of @disaster master30 trolling.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
301 posts
Prince

7 You clearly do not grasp at all the concept "trolling" if what you think that I am doing is trolling

meaosome
offline
meaosome
155 posts
Scribe

8. Why are you arguing about the semantics? Just chill; you're being a prick.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
227 posts
Peasant

9. I go for a day and this happenes. c'mon guys its not the end of the world just count

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
486 posts
Peasant

10. @disastermaster30 there's minimum security prison and then there's AMX Florence; they are both prisons even if they look very different from one another. Keep counting!

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
227 posts
Peasant

11. ok bro

meaosome
offline
meaosome
155 posts
Scribe

12. I miss the good old days, when Flash worked, the site was maintained, and we didn't have this ---- in the count. I suppose I should apologize to Gantic. (Also, are mods active enough to swat us if we swear?)

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
486 posts
Peasant

13. I find it hard to believe that everyone was always polite when the count was much more active in the old days. Also, if anyone wants to complain about my posts specifically (either for rules broken or unkindness) don't hesitate to let me know.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
227 posts
Peasant

14. if you swear nothing will happen but im not swearing

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
486 posts
Peasant

15. Well Rob1221 released another classic "Lava and Aqua" that I finished recently.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,788 posts
Justiciar

16. Back in the olden days of... before 2 years ago, you used to be able to swear all you wanted to. Of course, you wouldn't. Sometimes you'd self-censor, sometimes you'd let the natural censorator paint a big row of asterisks over your beautifully molded works of written art.

Now you can't. Don't swear at all. It took me literal months of getting banned with literally no explanation to figure out that it was because I swore. I wasn't even trying to get past the censor, I was getting banned for those bloody asterisks.

Don't swear, you'll get banned for a week, then a month when you continue. Personal experience.

Cheerio! Sciller, away!

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
486 posts
Peasant

17. On that cheerful note, let us continue.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
227 posts
Peasant

18. ne swearing for me

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,722 posts
Chamberlain

19. That's pretty wild sciller, I had no clue. Back in my day people would get around the censor with various symbols and I don't recall people getting in trouble for it. I guess that's their alternative since the mods are effectively gone

Showing 76231-76245 of 78070

We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing analytics and serving ads.
Learn More