ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78286 45599991
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,286 Replies
saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

34. One would think they would either close the website entirely or do what Kongregate is doing.

HalRazor
offline
HalRazor
154 posts
Grand Duke

35. Kongregate at least did not remove their flash games. It is still possible to play flash games (even on armor games, if you do it right), but AG obviously decided against it

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

36. Kong has the better business plan going forward, which is unfortunate since I liked this site better before Flash games were removed.

Widestsinger
online
Widestsinger
269 posts
Bard

37. I still like this site but there’s not much to do anymore.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

38. I wish quests would come back soon; that might get some community going again.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,769 posts
Chamberlain

39. Agreed, but unfortunately that's largely out of AG's control. They just have to wait for quest games to be supported by Ripple

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,981 posts
Grand Duke

40. Need Matt to come back

Widestsinger
online
Widestsinger
269 posts
Bard

41. What is ripple and why do they get to choose??

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

42. But why put the avm1 games up if the avm2 games would probably work better at this point of Ruffle's development?

HalRazor
offline
HalRazor
154 posts
Grand Duke

43. Before the avm2 games were removed from AG, it was enough to set the clock back to a date before Flash's End-of-Life. Even Quests worked. I wrote a manual and posted it in the chat, but it was deleted without a reason. Then AG removed the quests and turned the games invisible (they are still accessable).

In my opinion, this was not neccessary. It seems they did not want to enable flash games. Is AG intentionally dying?

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

44. I don't understand their rationale either.

Widestsinger
online
Widestsinger
269 posts
Bard

45. 300 iq

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,981 posts
Grand Duke

46. Ask the devs for clarification.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
574 posts
Peasant

47. What does 300 iq mean?

Widestsinger
online
Widestsinger
269 posts
Bard

48. Something that smart people (like you) have.

Showing 76771-76785 of 78286