ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78604 54819910
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,604 Replies
Financer
offline
Financer
12 posts
Herald

9. and hopes up.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

10 - will we democratically vote about banning Ms/As from this thread?

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. (Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.)
armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

11. nooooooooooo that time we reached 62! WHY!?

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

12. Because they can.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

13. and they are "evil"

TiSe88
offline
TiSe88
432 posts
King

15. The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot confirm their validity
- Abraham Lincoln

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

16. just gather about 6 friends and they all keep counting and posting fast and editing faster until count to 100 when no |\\/| 0 D S are here.
- Barack Obama (but not)

TiSe88
offline
TiSe88
432 posts
King

17. Theoretically, three people would be enough

pickpocket
offline
pickpocket
5,952 posts
Shepherd

18. 3 people on late night have a chance

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

19 - three people? They would go mad. Four at least. Five or six would be ideal.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

20. why don't we do it now!?

TiSe88
offline
TiSe88
432 posts
King

21. We're four people now. Quick rush?

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

22. YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

23. We can try...

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

24. here we go, what will we talk about, so?

Showing 16921-16935 of 78604