ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78654 56699303
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,654 Replies
robsob20061017
offline
robsob20061017
25 posts
Bard

9. I'm back! anybody here?

TheFatRabbit
offline
TheFatRabbit
40 posts
Shepherd

10. We are all here. Sadly my post this morning did not go through.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

11. We are here but people keep failing.

TheFatRabbit
offline
TheFatRabbit
40 posts
Shepherd

12. I try not to let that be me.

Bears_Bears_Bears
offline
Bears_Bears_Bears
107 posts
Regent

13. Mistakes happen, that's why getting to one hundo is so hard

TheFatRabbit
offline
TheFatRabbit
40 posts
Shepherd

14. Not to mention the filthy sadists (mods)(according to @sciller45).

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

1. Did someone need a mod? I'm happy to help! Just let me know!

Bears_Bears_Bears
offline
Bears_Bears_Bears
107 posts
Regent

1. Thanks for the help, mod

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

2. Let's not mention you-know-who in order to avoid more restarts XD

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,873 posts
Chancellor

3. I told you not to mention their names! There are plenty of other alternatives. "them" "you-know-whos" "Filthy sadists" etc. As long as you say a demeaning name, we'll know who it is.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

4. I feel we are going in circles

TheFatRabbit
offline
TheFatRabbit
40 posts
Shepherd

5. The race against the filthy sadists begins again.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

6. This a good number, don't you think so?

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

7. No, I can't see why.

robsob20061017
offline
robsob20061017
25 posts
Bard

8. This number is whole lotta better than 6.

Showing 74356-74370 of 78654