ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78613 54973787
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,613 Replies
Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

60. That's good to know. Now to think about muffins.

MPH_Complexity
offline
MPH_Complexity
366 posts
Duke

61. Muffin and a glass of orange juice for breakfast everyday.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

62. And a poisonous cookie.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

63. Since you're a robot, the poison must not effect you.

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

Sorry guys, but there's an edit. Might as well start over.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

1. But it wasn't a number edit, right?

MPH_Complexity
offline
MPH_Complexity
366 posts
Duke

2. Didn't appear to be...I think the mods just like dropping a combo breaker every now and then and try to cover it up :P.

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Treasurer

3. You are misinterpreting the no editing rule. Here's the rule as stated in the OP:

*No editing. You can't edit the number after 30 seconds of posting. Within 30 seconds is fine.


The general rule is no editing. The number edit within 30 seconds is an acceptable correction of a mistake, but editing is otherwise not allowed according to no editing. Unless the mods want to allow text edits after 30 seconds, then the rule should be clarified to:

*No editing. You can't edit after 30 seconds of posting. Within 30 seconds is fine.

or

*No editing after 30 seconds of posting.
Reton8
offline
Reton8
3,173 posts
King

I'm sure I'm just interpreting this wrong, but

ADDiTiONAL CONSiDERATiONS
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.


Does considerations mean you should follow them, but you don't have to because they are not quite rules? (I really doubt this though.)
Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

1. If that's true, the next person to post can win. But of course, they can't.

MPH_Complexity
offline
MPH_Complexity
366 posts
Duke

2. It was already tried before, of course it can't be that simple hehe.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

3. Guten tag! (Good day!)

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

4. So now we start over? *sighs*

MPH_Complexity
offline
MPH_Complexity
366 posts
Duke

5. Anyone else having a field day for the steam summer sale?

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

6. Nope.

Showing 3676-3690 of 78613