ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78408 46529124
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,408 Replies
ddevil6
offline
ddevil6
126 posts
King

11. multiple accounts?

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

12. By going straight to 100.

bakkart
offline
bakkart
636 posts
Prince

13. How about copying answers off of a classmate's paper? (Oh, looks like "13" is the right answer here ....)

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

14. I assume cheating would be using multiple accounts.

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,988 posts
Grand Duke

15 Seems the only way to do it.

bakkart
offline
bakkart
636 posts
Prince

16. Well, off to work. I'll look for my "Shiny New Quest" in my profile when I come back. Best of luck in this wave!

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

17. Much harder to prove would be to have multiple people in the same room so you could coordinate non-ninja posts.

Alpha900i
offline
Alpha900i
160 posts
King

18. Cheating may include looking for some loopholes in rules. So I assume

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,988 posts
Grand Duke

19 This is a conspiracy.

http://files.armorgames.com/misc/VDdMvQqONk7E7lFPlyQ2_AG-Easter-Egg---Pink-EG.png
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

20. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without inventing them. Like the fact that the gubmit is using mind controlling waves beamed from cell phone towers to control you!

lmba
offline
lmba
21 posts
Lord

21. beu

eras
offline
eras
83 posts
King

22. ÐÑивеÑ

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

23. Please no Russian. Nobody will be able to understand you.

eras
offline
eras
83 posts
King

24. u did

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,827 posts
Duke

Just to clarify - using multiple accounts, while not an explicit violation of the CT100 rules, is a violation of AG rules. Doing so would most certainly result in the ban of at least one account, at which point those user's posts would be deleted and the count would be all wonky.

Coordinating in some real time environment, though --- now that's thinking!

Showing 9811-9825 of 78408